From: Paul Lalonde (plalonde2@cogeco.ca)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2003 - 14:28:09 GMT-3
James,
You're right. On the router that these routes are injected into (via
network command) you'll need the area range command to summarize them.
If they're redistributed, you'll need summary address.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "JamesGEF" <jamesgef@sympatico.ca>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "Paul Lalonde" <plalonde2@cogeco.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Distributing loopback into OSPF
> Paul, I believe by doing it that way, at its default configuration, OSPF
> will still distribute the routes as /32.
>
> For example,
>
> int lo10
> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> router ospf 1
> network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
>
> This will distribute the route as 10.1.1.1/32 and not 10.1.1.0/24
>
> James.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Lalonde" <plalonde2@cogeco.ca>
> To: "JamesGEF" <jamesgef@sympatico.ca>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Distributing loopback into OSPF
>
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > network statement under the OSPF process????
> >
> > Paul
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "JamesGEF" <jamesgef@sympatico.ca>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:59 AM
> > Subject: Distributing loopback into OSPF
> >
> >
> > > In one of IPExpert 5.0 exercises, I had to distribute loopback IP
> > addresses
> > > into OSPF without the /32 mask...they had to be seen with 24-bit
> subnets.
> > It
> > > states in the notes that there are 3 ways of doing this. I could only
> > think
> > > of two:
> > >
> > > 1. change the network type of the loopback interfaces so that it
doesn't
> > > default to /32 mask.
> > > 2. redistribute connected and summarize the addresses with a /24 mask
> > >
> > >
> > > I can't think of the third way.
> > >
> > > any ideas?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:10 GMT-3