RE: DLSW icanreach & icannotreach

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2003 - 09:10:56 GMT-3


Everything in DLSW refers to non-canonical addresses. Whether there is
TR in your lab or not makes no difference. The entire thought process
of DLSW is just like that of TR. So you go ethernet (canonical) -->
dlsw (non-canonical) --> ethernet (canonical).

So yes, you must flip the address.

 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
CISSP, JNCIS, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Pun, Alec CL
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:44 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW icanreach & icannotreach

Just want to double confirm :

If I was given an Ethernet MAC address 1234.1234.1234 (canonical
format), should I do conversion when used in the dlsw icanreach &
icannotreach command ?

regards,
alec



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:10 GMT-3