From: Debbie Westall (dwestall@debbie.coxfiber.net)
Date: Tue Nov 04 2003 - 15:34:36 GMT-3
After you read the exam throughly, configure something that you know 100%.
That way you have a good feeling. You get something out of the way that
you know is correct.
If you have to spend more than 15 minutes on one topic move on. Go to
something different and come back to that topic.
Good Luck with your Lab
Debbie
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Scott Morris wrote:
> You should read the entire exam before you configure anything. I'd
> suggest reading it twice.
>
> That way you can look ahead of time to see any issues and start
> developing a strategy for doing things. Key in on any item later in the
> exam that may affect something you did earlier.
>
> If not specified, ANY solution will work. However, some may be more of
> a pain in the rear to implement because of later requirements and still
> needing to keep the early stuff going!
>
> I am all for keeping things simple. But read the whole exam and make
> sure that simple really is simple all the way through! The logical
> approach is just like real-life in that aspect! KISS method. :) (It's
> just that the lab can through in requirements that real-life doesn't)
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> CISSP, JNCIS, et al.
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
> http://www.ipexpert.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Martin D. Fierbaugh
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:30 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Lab Tactics
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> My question is in relation to tactics. There are many options for
> completing a particular task. However, I imagine taking a certain
> approach verses another may keep you out of troubleshooting hot water.
>
>
>
>
> My question is, if given a scenario where you have several options are
> you better off to keep it as simple as possible or try to dig deeper to
> find out what the test is looking for (i.e. read ahead). I am sure
> people have configd themselves into corners before by trying to impress
> (BGP comes to mind) the grading proctor.
>
>
>
> I have found that real world implementation can differ from approaches
> to a lab environment and I am afraid my views may be jaded by my own
> personal experiences and design practices.
>
>
>
> Any advice would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Martin D. Fierbaugh, CCNP
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.530 / Virus Database: 325 - Release Date: 10/22/2003
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:08 GMT-3