From: pauldongso (pauldongso@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 02 2003 - 03:47:48 GMT-3
May I ask a simple question here?
If I use ATM main interface instead of subinterface, (p2p here) , will
the configuration still work? Can I imagine the relation between atm
main interface and subinterface is exactly the same as frame relay?
/snip/
interface ATM0/0/0
pvc 0/201
encapsulation aal5snap
protocol ppp Virtual-Template1
/snip/
Thanks
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian Dennis
Sent: Monday, 27 October 2003 3:17 AM
To: loai@kuix.com
Cc: 'David Deng'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RE: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA virtual Access int
NAT would go on the virtual-template interface. Here is a working
configuration:
interface Loopback0
ip address 150.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback10
ip address 10.1.1.6 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
!
interface ATM0/0/0
no ip address
!
interface ATM0/0/0.201 point-to-point
pvc 0/201
encapsulation aal5snap
protocol ppp Virtual-Template1
!
!
interface Virtual-Template1
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ip nat outside
ppp chap hostname ROUTER6
ppp chap password 0 CISCO
!
ip nat inside source list 1 interface Loopback0 overload
!
access-list 1 permit 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
Rack1R6#ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 54.1.7.254
Repeat count [5]:
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]: y
Source address or interface: 10.1.1.6
Type of service [0]:
Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
Validate reply data? [no]:
Data pattern [0xABCD]:
Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
Sweep range of sizes [n]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 54.1.7.254, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4
ms Rack1R6#sho ip nat trans
Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside
global
icmp 150.1.6.6:7279 10.1.1.6:7279 54.1.7.254:7279
54.1.7.254:7279
icmp 150.1.6.6:7280 10.1.1.6:7280 54.1.7.254:7280
54.1.7.254:7280
icmp 150.1.6.6:7281 10.1.1.6:7281 54.1.7.254:7281
54.1.7.254:7281
icmp 150.1.6.6:7282 10.1.1.6:7282 54.1.7.254:7282
54.1.7.254:7282
icmp 150.1.6.6:7283 10.1.1.6:7283 54.1.7.254:7283
54.1.7.254:7283
Rack1R6#
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
loai@kuix.com
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 11:24 PM
To: Brian Dennis
Cc: 'David Deng'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RE: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA virtual Access int
Hi Brian..
when I want to do nating ..ip nat inside or outside..Should be apply it
on virtual-template or in atm interface according to the David
configuration?i.e when I put the ip address on atm interface Building
configuration...
Current configuration : 81 bytes
!
interface Virtual-Template1
ip unnumbered ATM0.3
no peer neighbor-route
end
Regards
Nizar
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
Date: Sunday, October 26, 2003 9:04 am
Subject: RE: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA virtual Access int
> After you apply the command you will need to bounce the interface.
> At the
> bottom of this e-mail is a working example with a virtual-template and
> PPPoA.
>
> Before you disable the peer neighbor-route command let me ask you
> this. How
> are you going to be able to reach the remote side's unnumbered
> interface if
> you disable PPP's ability to install a route for it in the routing
> table?Basically you need to understand what the peer neighbor-
> route command does
> and what the effects are of removing it. If you are doing IP
> unnumbered I
> would 'not' recommend disabling the peer neighbor-route command.
>
> Rack1R6#sho ip route connected | in /32
> C 54.1.7.254/32 is directly connected, Virtual-Access2
> Rack1R6#conf t
> Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> Rack1R6(config)#int virtual-template 1
> Rack1R6(config-if)#no peer neighbor-route
> Rack1R6(config-if)#int atm0/0/0
> Rack1R6(config-if)#shut
> *Jun 7 05:55:12.216: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access2,
> changedstate to down
> *Jun 7 05:55:12.788: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface ATM0/0/0, changed
> state to
> administratively down
> *Jun 7 05:55:13.216: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> Virtual-Access2, changed state to down
> *Jun 7 05:55:13.788: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> ATM0/0/0, changed state to down
> *Jun 7 05:55:31.812: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface ATM0/0/0, changed
> state to
> down
> Rack1R6(config-if)#no shut
> Rack1R6(config-if)#^Z
> Rack1R6#
> *Jun 7 05:55:35.128: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface ATM0/0/0, changed
> state to
> up
> *Jun 7 05:55:35.728: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by
> console*Jun 7 05:55:36.128: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on
> InterfaceATM0/0/0, changed state to up
> *Jun 7 05:55:49.616: %LANE-6-INFO: ATM0/0/0: ILMI prefix add
> event received
> *Jun 7 05:55:52.216: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access2,
> changedstate to up
> *Jun 7 05:55:53.224: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> Virtual-Access2, changed state to up
> Rack1R6#sho ip route connected | in /32
> Rack1R6#
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of
> David Deng
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 4:18 PM
> To: Brian Dennis
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA virtual Access int
>
> Brian,
>
> Thanks for reply.
> I did have the command on the virtual-template and it
> did not make any difference for me. So I decided to
> ask for help...
>
>
> r9#sh run int virtual-te 1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 81 bytes
> !
> interface Virtual-Template1
> ip unnumbered ATM0.3
> no peer neighbor-route
> end
>
> Thanks,
> David
> --- Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> wrote:
> > Did you try "no peer neighbor-route"? I'm assuming
> > you are using PPP since
> > you mentioned a virtual-access interface.
> >
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > David Deng
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:24 PM
> > To: David Deng
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA
> > virtual Access int
> >
> > Missing some information here.
> >
> > The routers are running Eigrp.
> > They saw each other interface as /32.
> >
> > Regards,
> > David
> >
> > two routers are
> > --- David Deng <glend_99@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > Does anyone knows how to remove the /32 host route
> > > caused by the virtual-access ?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > > David
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product
> > > search
> > > http://shopping.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> > > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your
> > > study materials from:
> > > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product
> > search
> > http://shopping.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your
> > study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your
> > study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
> http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:07 GMT-3