From: Joe Martin (jmartin@capitalpremium.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 2003 - 15:43:34 GMT-3
Alan,
Instructions for removing yourself from the list can be found at
www.groupstudy.com
Thank you,
Joe Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Kelley Alan
Sent: October 27, 2003 11:26 AM
To: nettable_walker@comcast.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: enable tftp service on a Nortel ASN router ?
Ok here we go! This is a CCIE Lab Study group not a General answer any
question about any vendors equipment group! And since you are a CCIE I
would think that you would appreciate not posting subjects about other
vendors to this group! You are right the whole world doesn't revolve
around Cisco but, this CCIE Lab Study group does!!!
Thank you
-----Original Message-----
From: nettable_walker@comcast.net [mailto:nettable_walker@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:19 PM
To: Kelley Alan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: enable tftp service on a Nortel ASN router ?
There are many on this list (including myself) who have worked on a
whole lotta stuff besides Cisco & who realize the whole world does not
revolve around cisco.
Cisco just payes the most right now.
In the past year people on this list have helped me to -
1) reset the password on a Marconi/FORE ATM switch
2) configure a Shiva LANrover with IPX
3) pass the CCIE lab
Thanks everyone !
Richard L. Pickard
CCIE# 12388
Nortel Networks Certified Support Expert
CCNP CCDP MCSE A+
//
> I understand that this is a group for us to assist each other but, I
> think this is a little much. This has nothing and never will have
> anything to do with the CCIE Lab? Unless I am missing something? I
am
> sure that we get enough emails from the group to keep us busy for
> sometime with out having to filter through these types of emails as
> well.
>
> Alan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nettable_walker@comcast.net
[mailto:nettable_walker@comcast.net]
>
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:41 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: enable tftp service on a Nortel ASN router ?
>
> Can anyone tell me how to do this ?
> I am trying to upgrade a Nortel ASN from 15.4.0.2 to 15.4.2.2
>
> This is what I am getting ---
>
> ASN_BLUE_tftp get 10.100.40.40 asn.exe 1:asn.exe
> TFTP service not active.
>
> ASN_BLUE_stamp
>
> Image: rel/15.4.0.2/
> Created: Wed Nov 6 15:28:28 EST 2002
>
> > Brian,
> >
> > Some Service provider might not want to reveal what's
> > the IP address, and there is already a /24 route, it
> > looks redundant to have a more specific route.
> >
> > I am thinkig maybe use dial(er) interface could
> > achieve that ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > David
> >
> >
> > --- Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > wrote:
> > > David,
> > >
> > > Why do you want to remove the host route in the
> > > first place?
> > >
> > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > >
> > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > > Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > David Deng
> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 1:52 PM
> > > > To: Brian Dennis
> > > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: RE: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA
> > > virtual Access int
> > > >
> > > > Hi Brian,
> > > >
> > > > I must be missing something here.
> > > >
>
> > > > After I done the shut/no sh, the route is still
> > > here.
> > > > You are right about the neighbor not been
> > > accessible
> > > > after the command " no peer neighbor-route " and
> > > need
> > > > a bounce on the atm interface.
> > > >
> > > > My point is it may not be desiable to install the
> > > host
> > > >
> > > > route onto other routers.
> > > >
> > > > on r9 :
> > > > int a0.3 multipoint
> > > > ip add 136.10.66.9 255.255.255.0
> > > > snip
> > > > ...
> > > > Sh ip ro here still has the route can not be
> > > remove.
> > > >
> > > > C 136.10.66.6/32 is directly connected,
> > > > Virtual-Access1
> > > >
> > > > It shows as directly connected for the
> > > virtual-access1
> > > > of the neighbor(r6)as /32 host address. It is a
> > > /24
> > > > address from r6 side.
> > > >
> > > > Is this the nature of Vitrtual-templeate ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Gwan
> > > > --- Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > After you apply the command you will need to
> > > bounce
> > > > > the interface. At the
> > > > > bottom of this e-mail is a working example with
> > > a
>
> > > > > virtual-template and
> > > > > PPPoA.
> > > > >
> > > > > Before you disable the peer neighbor-route
> > > command
> > > > > let me ask you this. How
> > > > > are you going to be able to reach the remote
> > > side's
> > > > > unnumbered interface if
> > > > > you disable PPP's ability to install a route for
> > > it
> > > > > in the routing table?
> > > > > Basically you need to understand what the peer
> > > > > neighbor-route command does
> > > > > and what the effects are of removing it. If you
> > > are
> > > > > doing IP unnumbered I
> > > > > would 'not' recommend disabling the peer
> > > > > neighbor-route command.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rack1R6#sho ip route connected | in /32
> > > > > C 54.1.7.254/32 is directly connected,
> > > > > Virtual-Access2
> > > > > Rack1R6#conf t
> > > > > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End
> > > > > with CNTL/Z.
> > > > > Rack1R6(config)#int virtual-template 1
> > > > > Rack1R6(config-if)#no peer neighbor-route
> > > > > Rack1R6(config-if)#int atm0/0/0
> > > > > Rack1R6(config-if)#shut
>
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:12.216: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface
> > > > > Virtual-Access2, changed
> > > > > state to down
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:12.788: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface
> > > > > ATM0/0/0, changed state to
> > > > > administratively down
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:13.216: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line
> > > > > protocol on Interface
> > > > > Virtual-Access2, changed state to down
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:13.788: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line
> > > > > protocol on Interface
> > > > > ATM0/0/0, changed state to down
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:31.812: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface
> > > > > ATM0/0/0, changed state to
> > > > > down
> > > > > Rack1R6(config-if)#no shut
> > > > > Rack1R6(config-if)#^Z
> > > > > Rack1R6#
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:35.128: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface
> > > > > ATM0/0/0, changed state to
> > > > > up
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:35.728: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I:
> > > Configured
> > > > > from console by console
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:36.128: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line
> > > > > protocol on Interface
> > > > > ATM0/0/0, changed state to up
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:49.616: %LANE-6-INFO: ATM0/0/0:
>
> > > ILMI
> > > > > prefix add event received
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:52.216: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface
> > > > > Virtual-Access2, changed
> > > > > state to up
> > > > > *Jun 7 05:55:53.224: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line
> > > > > protocol on Interface
> > > > > Virtual-Access2, changed state to up
> > > > > Rack1R6#sho ip route connected | in /32
> > > > > Rack1R6#
> > > > >
> > > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > > > > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > > > > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > > > David Deng
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 4:18 PM
> > > > > To: Brian Dennis
> > > > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > Subject: RE: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA
> > > > > virtual Access int
> > > > >
> > > > > Brian,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reply.
>
> > > > > I did have the command on the virtual-template
> > > and
> > > > > it
> > > > > did not make any difference for me. So I decided
> > > to
> > > > > ask for help...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > r9#sh run int virtual-te 1
> > > > > Building configuration...
> > > > >
> > > > > Current configuration : 81 bytes
> > > > > !
> > > > > interface Virtual-Template1
> > > > > ip unnumbered ATM0.3
> > > > > no peer neighbor-route
> > > > > end
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > David
> > > > > --- Brian Dennis
> > > <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Did you try "no peer neighbor-route"? I'm
> > > assuming
> > > > > > you are using PPP since
> > > > > > you mentioned a virtual-access interface.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210
> > > (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > > > > > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> > > > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > > > > > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and
> > > Canada)
> > > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > > > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>
> > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > >
> > === message truncated ===
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
> > http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:09 GMT-3