From: David Deng (glend_99@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Oct 26 2003 - 16:51:30 GMT-3
Hi Brian,
I must be missing something here.
After I done the shut/no sh, the route is still here.
You are right about the neighbor not been accessible
after the command " no peer neighbor-route " and need
a bounce on the atm interface.
My point is it may not be desiable to install the host
route onto other routers.
on r9 :
int a0.3 multipoint
ip add 136.10.66.9 255.255.255.0
snip
...
Sh ip ro here still has the route can not be remove.
C 136.10.66.6/32 is directly connected,
Virtual-Access1
It shows as directly connected for the virtual-access1
of the neighbor(r6)as /32 host address. It is a /24
address from r6 side.
Is this the nature of Vitrtual-templeate ?
Thanks,
Gwan
--- Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
wrote:
> After you apply the command you will need to bounce
> the interface. At the
> bottom of this e-mail is a working example with a
> virtual-template and
> PPPoA.
>
> Before you disable the peer neighbor-route command
> let me ask you this. How
> are you going to be able to reach the remote side's
> unnumbered interface if
> you disable PPP's ability to install a route for it
> in the routing table?
> Basically you need to understand what the peer
> neighbor-route command does
> and what the effects are of removing it. If you are
> doing IP unnumbered I
> would 'not' recommend disabling the peer
> neighbor-route command.
>
> Rack1R6#sho ip route connected | in /32
> C 54.1.7.254/32 is directly connected,
> Virtual-Access2
> Rack1R6#conf t
> Enter configuration commands, one per line. End
> with CNTL/Z.
> Rack1R6(config)#int virtual-template 1
> Rack1R6(config-if)#no peer neighbor-route
> Rack1R6(config-if)#int atm0/0/0
> Rack1R6(config-if)#shut
> *Jun 7 05:55:12.216: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface
> Virtual-Access2, changed
> state to down
> *Jun 7 05:55:12.788: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface
> ATM0/0/0, changed state to
> administratively down
> *Jun 7 05:55:13.216: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line
> protocol on Interface
> Virtual-Access2, changed state to down
> *Jun 7 05:55:13.788: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line
> protocol on Interface
> ATM0/0/0, changed state to down
> *Jun 7 05:55:31.812: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface
> ATM0/0/0, changed state to
> down
> Rack1R6(config-if)#no shut
> Rack1R6(config-if)#^Z
> Rack1R6#
> *Jun 7 05:55:35.128: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface
> ATM0/0/0, changed state to
> up
> *Jun 7 05:55:35.728: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured
> from console by console
> *Jun 7 05:55:36.128: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line
> protocol on Interface
> ATM0/0/0, changed state to up
> *Jun 7 05:55:49.616: %LANE-6-INFO: ATM0/0/0: ILMI
> prefix add event received
> *Jun 7 05:55:52.216: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface
> Virtual-Access2, changed
> state to up
> *Jun 7 05:55:53.224: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line
> protocol on Interface
> Virtual-Access2, changed state to up
> Rack1R6#sho ip route connected | in /32
> Rack1R6#
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> David Deng
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 4:18 PM
> To: Brian Dennis
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA
> virtual Access int
>
> Brian,
>
> Thanks for reply.
> I did have the command on the virtual-template and
> it
> did not make any difference for me. So I decided to
> ask for help...
>
>
> r9#sh run int virtual-te 1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 81 bytes
> !
> interface Virtual-Template1
> ip unnumbered ATM0.3
> no peer neighbor-route
> end
>
> Thanks,
> David
> --- Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> wrote:
> > Did you try "no peer neighbor-route"? I'm assuming
> > you are using PPP since
> > you mentioned a virtual-access interface.
> >
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > David Deng
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:24 PM
> > To: David Deng
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: remove the /32 host route for PPPOA
> > virtual Access int
> >
> > Missing some information here.
> >
> > The routers are running Eigrp.
> > They saw each other interface as /32.
> >
> > Regards,
> > David
> >
> > two routers are
> > --- David Deng <glend_99@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > Does anyone knows how to remove the /32 host
> route
> > > caused by the virtual-access ?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > > David
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product
> > > search
> > > http://shopping.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:08 GMT-3