From: Donny MATEO (donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com)
Date: Sun Oct 12 2003 - 22:37:28 GMT-3
Just a word of advice.
Do what the question ask you, not what you would normally do in real life
exercise. No matter how good your answer is, if you don't satisfy the
question requirement, you're not gonna get that point you desperately
need. If you're unclear as in this case, ask the procotor on which one he
prefered.
Donny
Hunt Lee <hunt_lee@bigpond.net.au>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
10/12/2003 10:20 PM
Please respond to Hunt Lee
To: Chen Kwong Wai William <kwchen@netvigator.com>
cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com, (bcc: Donny MATEO/ADPC/ASIA/BANQUE_INDOSUEZ/FR)
Subject: Re: Which one should I pick ?
Hey William,
Thank you so much for that.
When we are setting CoS on 3550, is "mls qos cos override" a mandatory
command with it?
In another words:
interface FastEthernet0/7
switchport access vlan 567
switchport mode access
no ip address
mls qos cos 5
mls qos cos override
end
Is this correct?
Or is the 'mls qos cos override' independent of the 'mls qos cos' command?
If so, when would you use the mls qos cos override command?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Lee
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chen Kwong Wai William" <kwchen@netvigator.com>
To: "Hunt Lee" <hunt_lee@bigpond.net.au>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: Which one should I pick ?
> Hi Hunt,
>
> According to the DQoS Certification Guide Book, it is normally do
> shaping on output interface and police on input interface.
>
> I hope this will help you to make decision.
>
> Best Regards,
> William Chen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hunt Lee" <hunt_lee@bigpond.net.au>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:05 AM
> Subject: Which one should I pick ?
>
>
> > If I have a question:
> >
> > Configure CBWFQ on R1's Ethernet interface such that it allocates min
> bandwidth of 3mbps for VLANA. VLANA traffic should limit to 5mbps and
> cannot utilize more physical bandwidth during non-congestion period.
> >
> > Should I use:
> >
> > policy-map cbwfq
> > class VLAND
> > bandwidth 3000
> > shape peak 5000000
> >
> > OR
> >
> > policy-map cbwfq
> > class VLAND
> > bandwidth 3000
> > police 5000000 937500 1875000 conform-action transmit exceed-action
> drop violate-action drop
> >
> > And if you could give me reasoning on why you pick that one, it would
be
> greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thank you so much in advance,
> > H.
> >
> > ***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:00 GMT-3