From: Alvarez, Rolando [NCSUS] (RAlvare5@NCSUS.JNJ.COM)
Date: Wed Oct 08 2003 - 13:59:56 GMT-3
Ken,
This is weird indeed. Specially since it looks like you only have one
connection between r2 and r3, so route-cache shouldn't really matter. You
need to post the configs.
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com
[mailto:Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 9:59 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: NAT issue (i think)
NAT
| outs ins
| +----+ +----+ +----+ |L
|-------| R1 |------| R2 |------| R3 |--------------|A 1
| +----+e0 e0+----+s0 s0+----+e0 |N
hi guys,
I have the above and I am using NAT with a pool on R3 (simple config)
!
ip nat pool E0-POOL 142.220.1.10 142.220.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside source list 1 pool E0-POOL
Now, why is it, that when I turn on "ip route-cache" on the serial0 on R2,
packets no longer get forwarded down the serial back to the NAT pool, it has
a
directly connected and when I turn off "ip route-cache" everything is fine.
Its a weird one, so just incase anyone has seen this before.
Kind regards,
Ken
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about Barclays Capital, please
visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes,
it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is
caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays
Group for operational or business reasons.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:52:59 GMT-3