RE: DLSw's routing (difficult)

From: Snow, Tim (timothy.snow@eds.com)
Date: Wed Oct 08 2003 - 00:31:15 GMT-3


You could use Backup peers or you could use load balancing based on cost

Backup peer configuration example here (it's IDSN but it works in your
example too)

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk331/tk336/technologies_configuration_examp
le09186a0080093ecb.shtml

Load Balancing based on cost is located here

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_
c/bcprt2/bcddlsw.htm#84357

HTH

Tim
#12042

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Young [mailto:gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:18 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSw's routing (difficult)

Hi, group

    I meet a difficult question, I am in HQ, have two
lines connect with remote office.
    One line service for IP packet, and another one
service for DLSw, I know I could use route-map to deal it,
but I need the DLSw's backup!
   I means if the dlsw line was cut , it could use ip's
line to reconnecting.
The difficult point is: DLSw should use dlsw line to
transfer the SNA packet. And IP line back up it !
You know DLSw is base on IP, it use IP route to set relationship, and use
that line to transfer SNA, So, infact, althought the dlsw peer connected on
dlsw line's points, the SNA packet was still transfered by IP's line. I
confused it.

Thanks alot



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:52:58 GMT-3