Re: IP RSVP

From: Annu Roopa (annu_roopa@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 12:27:02 GMT-3

• Next message: Phil: "RE: Possible NAT?"
• Previous message: Ozgur Guler (Garanti Teknoloji): "RE: ISIS route filtering"
• Maybe in reply to: Alec: "IP RSVP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Alec,
 
I think you should enable both.This is my reasoning:
 
RSVP will allocate and reserve the b/w to voice traffic,but wont prioritize them.There may be other RSVP based apps sharing the same link.
 
So if we enable ip rtp priority then Voice traffic will get priority along with b/w when other apps or flows are also there.
 
Correct me or add if required.
 
Annu
 
 
>Hi group,
>
>If I enabled "ip rsvp bandwidth", is it still necessary to configure
>"frame-relay ip rtp priority priority 16384 16383 32" to prioritize voice
>traffic ?
>
>Also, how about the command "ip rsvp pq-profile" ? The DocCD doesn't
>describe clearly on the usage.
>
>thanks
>alec

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***

• Next message: Phil: "RE: Possible NAT?"
• Previous message: Ozgur Guler (Garanti Teknoloji): "RE: ISIS route filtering"
• Maybe in reply to: Alec: "IP RSVP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:52:56 GMT-3