From: Barney Gaumer (bagaumer@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Sep 18 2003 - 16:35:52 GMT-3
I see.
Thanks Dave!
--- MADMAN <dmadlan@qwest.com> wrote:
> Barney Gaumer wrote:
>
> > That was a great explanation!
> >
> > I have a LMI related question that kind of
> dove-tails
> > with this.
> >
> > when I "debug frame-relay lmi" on one of my prod
> > routers at work, I see all of the PVC info for
> > "interface x" with status and bandwidth etc..
> >
> > When I do it at home I get bandwidth of 0. What
> LMI
> > type do I need to get the bandwidth to show up?
> or is
> > there something else I need to do on my frame
> switch??
>
> The default Cisco LMI will give you the
> configured bandwidth, (CIR)
> of the frame switch. I suspect this is whay some
> carriers force you to
> use ansi. We auto negotiate at Qwest.
>
> Dave
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Barney
> > --- Brian McGahan
> <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Ken,
> >>
> >> The 'frame-relay interface-dlci' command isn't
> used
> >>for protocol
> >>mappings, it's simply used to assign the VC to the
> >>interface. By
> >>default, all Frame-Relay VCs are assigned to the
> >>main interface.
> >>Therefore, the 'frame-relay interface-dlci'
> command
> >>on the interface is
> >>not used to assign the VC, but instead to apply
> >>attributes such as FRTS
> >>or VoFR on a per PVC basis.
> >>
> >> On a point-to-point or multipoint interface, the
> >>command still
> >>accomplishes the same thing, to assign the VC to
> the
> >>interface. On
> >>point-to-point interfaces, layer 2 to layer 3
> >>protocol resolution is not
> >>necessary, so assigning the VC is the only step.
> >>For multipoint sub
> >>interfaces, frame-relay inverse-arp is enabled by
> >>default. Therefore,
> >>if you use the frame-relay interface-dlci command
> on
> >>a multipoint
> >>subinterface, you will automatically send inarp
> >>requests on the VC for
> >>whatever protocols you are running on the
> interface.
> >> If you use the
> >>'frame-relay map' command, you are disabling
> >>inverse-arp for that
> >>protocol for that VC. If you use the 'no
> >>frame-relay inverse-arp', you
> >>are disabling inverse-arp for all protocols for
> all
> >>VCs on that
> >>interface.
> >>
> >>HTH,
> >>
> >>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> >>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> >>
> >>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> >>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> >>Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> >>Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >>
> >>[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> >>Of
> >>
> >>>Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com
> >>>Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:53 AM
> >>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>>Subject: RE: Frame-Relay HELP with static
> mappings
> >>
> >>:(
> >>
> >>>One thing to add, is that on the major interface
> >>
> >>when I use the frame-
> >>
> >>>relay
> >>>interface dlci command, it does not show up as a
> >>
> >>static entry and i
> >>get a
> >>
> >>>dynamic entry
> >>>
> >>>ie,
> >>>
> >>>!
> >>>interface Serial0
> >>> ip address 10.10.10.4 255.255.255.0
> >>> encapsulation frame-relay
> >>> frame-relay interface-dlci 401
> >>>!
> >>>
> >>>R4>sh frame map
> >>>Serial0 (up): ip 10.10.10.2 dlci
> >>
> >>401(0x191,0x6410), dynamic,
> >>
> >>> broadcast,, status defined, active
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>So even though you can put the command in, it
> does
> >>
> >>not seem to setup a
> >>
> >>>static entry on the router and gets the mapping
> >>
> >>dynamically :))
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Thx
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Farrington, Ken: IT (LDN)
> >>>Sent: 18 September 2003 17:49
> >>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>>Subject: RE: Frame-Relay HELP with static
> mappings
> >>
> >>:(
> >>
> >>>
> >>>thx dave. it's just working out all the
> >>
> >>combinations now so I am
> >>
> >>>confident
> >>>for my lab.
> >>>
> >>>and the combinations can be many correct?
> >>>
> >>>Is there a default guide to what is correct or
> not
> >>
> >>from a Cisco
> >>
> >>>standpoint.
> >>>I know real life may be different :))
> >>>
> >>>many thx for the quick reply.
> >>>Ken
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: MADMAN [mailto:dmadlan@qwest.com]
> >>>Sent: 18 September 2003 17:44
> >>>To: Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com
> >>>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>>Subject: Re: Frame-Relay HELP with static
> mappings
> >>
> >>:(
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Please could you guys help me on this and
> >>
> >>confirm what I am saying
> >>is
> >>
> >>>100%
> >>>
> >>>>correct?
> >>>>
> >>>>Major Interface (multipoint by nature)
> >>>>Only frame-relay map or Inverse ARP - Can enter
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:31 GMT-3