RE: isis neighbor adj problem

From: Ahmed Hassan (ahmed_hassan@rayatelecom.net)
Date: Sun Sep 07 2003 - 04:47:53 GMT-3


Hi
ISIS needs the two interfaces to be both point to point sub interface
or no both of them to be Multipoint (or no sub interface)

Best regards
-----Original Message-----
From: youshungang@hotmail.com [mailto:youshungang@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 8:28 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: isis neighbor adj problem

Hi group#,when I worked on a lab recently,I encountered a problem about
isis neighbor adj.
Here is my topology:
r3-s1--(frame-relay)--s0-r4-| e0
|
s0

below is the detailed config:

r3:
interface Serial0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.13.1.2 255.255.0.0
 ip router isis
 frame-relay interface-dlci 301
!
interface Serial1
 ip address 10.34.1.1 255.255.0.0
 ip router isis
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay interface-dlci 304
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
router isis
 net 01.3333.3333.3333.00

r4:
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 10.4.1.1 255.255.0.0
 ip router isis
!
interface Serial0
 ip address 10.34.1.2 255.255.0.0
 ip router isis
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay interface-dlci 403
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
router isis
 net 01.4444.4444.4444.00

I found that r3 and r4 cannot form isis neighbors.
When i debug the isis neighbor adj,here is the output:
r3#debug isis adj
IS-IS Adjacency related packets debugging is on
r3#
00:03:14: ISIS-Adj: Encapsulation failed for L1 LAN IIH on Serial1
00:03:15: ISIS-Adj: Encapsulation failed for L2 LAN IIH on Serial1
on r4,there is the same problem.

That confused me.The s0 should send serial IIH instead of LAN IIH since it
is not a lan interface.Why the interface s0 does not behave normally? What
cause this situation?
Who can help out the problem? I wasted too much time on it.
Please clarify it. Thanks a lot for any help!



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:24 GMT-3