From: Joe Freeman (joe.freeman@CenturyTel.com)
Date: Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:30:32 GMT-3
The best way to accomplish this is to use NIC's in the server that are capable of 802.1Q trunking, and setting up trunks to the switch(es).
That said, why would anyone want to do this?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
emad
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:33 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FW: One port in more than one vlan
Folks,
I meant by this subject , that if I can put the ports , connected to
servers in the HQ which are directly connected to the core switch , in
all the vlans of all sites , I think it will solve problem !!!!
But how can I do that , I know it is not possible in Cisco , am I right?
Then what is the solution?
Regards
-----Original Message-----
From: emad [mailto:emad@zakq8.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 9:24 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: One port in more than one vlan
Importance: High
Folks,
I'm facing a situation here with one of my customers,
I have a core switch 4507 connected to three sites through Giga port and
fiber cables in between all are common in one subnet 172.30.16.0/21 and
there is no configuration at all on any switch even the core , and they
have one broadcast domain, I need to prevent the IPs of each site from
talking to other IPs in other sites except the IPs of servers connected
directly on the core switch which are in the same subnet and broadcast
domain , the customer don't want to redesign his subnets again to make
each vlan with one subnet dedicated and routing of course (inter-vlan
routing) will be held on the core , how can I achieve the above purpose
within the same subnet range all over the sites?
Please advice
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:22 GMT-3