RE: Policy maps

From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Sat Aug 30 2003 - 23:54:32 GMT-3

• Next message: Chen Kwong Wai William: "OSPF ASBR host route"
• Previous message: navaid@rogers.com: "Re: Which is Correct between 4-ACLs ??"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "Policy maps"
• Next in thread: navaid@rogers.com: "Re: RE: Policy maps"
• Maybe reply: navaid@rogers.com: "Re: RE: Policy maps"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I actually thought about that after sending the email. Do you think they would be the same with "match access-group 1" in there? I think so.

Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: navaid@rogers.com [mailto:navaid@rogers.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 10:43 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Policy maps

I don't think they are same because
class-default ----> includes everything.
match input-interface Ethernet0 ----> is only from Ethernet0.

What about following:

class-map data
match access-group 1

access-list 1 permit any

• Next message: Chen Kwong Wai William: "OSPF ASBR host route"
• Previous message: navaid@rogers.com: "Re: Which is Correct between 4-ACLs ??"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "Policy maps"
• Next in thread: navaid@rogers.com: "Re: RE: Policy maps"
• Maybe reply: navaid@rogers.com: "Re: RE: Policy maps"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:11 GMT-3