RE: DLSW Lite (LLC2) - Cannot get end-to-end connectivity

From: Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com
Date: Thu Aug 28 2003 - 10:48:52 GMT-3


Bean,

YOU ARE A GENIUS!

Many many thx for your help!!!!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Farrington, Ken: IT (LDN)
Sent: 28 August 2003 06:29
To: 'Bean'; ccielab@groupstudy.com; Okuzumi, Ted: IT (NYK)
Subject: RE: DLSW Lite (LLC2) - Cannot get end-to-end connectivity

Yes, I did see an MTU 516 issue on the router when I did a debug dlsw core,
so not sure what debug it came from.

Cant wait to get home and try this :))

Will update all later today :))))))

-----Original Message-----
From: Bean [mailto:cciexiahb@yahoo.ca]
Sent: 28 August 2003 00:06
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Ted.Okuzumi@barclayscapital.com
Subject: Re: DLSW Lite (LLC2) - Cannot get end-to-end connectivity

I met the same problem serveral days ago. DLSW work only with TCP
encapsulation, but doesn't work with LLC encapsulation.

> > IBM-LAPTOP FOUND REMOTE on interface Serial0/0
max-lf********(516)**********

The problem is the MTU. Max-lf is 516 in your show dlsw reachability. Link
MTU must support 1500. Because LLC encapsulation cannot solve the
fragmentation correctly.

Try to use MTU 1600 on frame-relay interface. You will find that computer
can see each other.

Bean

----- Original Message -----
From: <Ted.Okuzumi@barclayscapital.com>
To: <Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: 2003e948f27f% 1:33 PM
Subject: RE: DLSW Lite (LLC2) - Cannot get end-to-end connectivity

> Ken,
>
> It appears you have 172.16.220.8 as the loopback for both routers.
> Was this your intention?
>
> Best regards,
> Ted
> CCIE #5684
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Farrington, Ken: IT (LDN)
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:37 PM
> > To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Subject: DLSW Lite (LLC2) - Cannot get end-to-end connectivity
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> >
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > I have a slight problem and being the idiot I am, i need to get it
> > sorted before I can get on with my study. It's a problem with DLSW
> > Lite which i probably wont even get in
> > the lab anyway but you know me. Im a sucka for pain!!!!!
> >
> > I cannot get DLSW lite to work (or cannot get the two win2k PCs to
> > find each other in network neighborhood browser).
> >
> > On the routers, you can see the MACs in the bridge group and using
> > the "show dlsw reachability" you can see both the local and remote
> > devices (MAC and Netbios names). I get transmit and
> > received packets on the "dlsw peer information and on the bridge group
> > information)
> > I even see a circuit being established when I try and mount the other
> > PCs file system.
> >
> >
> > What can I be doing wrong here? Spent hours on it now :(
> >
> > I have tried doing it on a point-to-point FR cct but I can even get
> > the peer to "connect" and I am using the correct configuration
> > recommended but on point-to-point, i get the
> > following from a debug "event:TIMER-TIMER EXPIRED state:CON_PEND"
> >
> > - MAN, WHO NEEDS DLSW LITE ANYWAY?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > device
> > compaq-laptop
> > ----------
> > |
> > |
> > |e0/1 bridge-group1
> > |
> > |
> > | FR multipoint
> > ccie-rtr7-------------------------ccie-rtr8
> > s0/0.1 s0/0 |
> > pvc 111 pvc 110 |
> > |
> > |e0/1 bridge-group1
> > |
> > |
> > ------------ e0/0 bridge-group1
> > device
> > ibm-laptop
> >
> > I have the following config :-
> >
> > ccie-rtr7 config
> > !
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.16.220.7 promiscuous
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0.1 111 dlsw
> > bridge-group 1 !
> > !
> > !
> > interface Loopback700
> > ip address 172.16.220.8 255.255.255.255
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/1
> > description VLAN 222
> > no ip address
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > no fair-queue
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > no ip split-horizon eigrp 2001
> > frame-relay map llc2 111 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.5 121 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.6 111 broadcast
> > !
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > !
> > end
> >
> >
> >
> > ccie-rtr8 config
> >
> > !
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.16.220.8
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 110
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > !
> > interface Loopback700
> > ip address 172.16.220.8 255.255.255.255
> > !
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > bandwidth 1544
> > ip address 172.16.1.6 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no ip mroute-cache
> > no fair-queue
> > cdp enable
> > frame-relay map llc2 110 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.5 110 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 110 broadcast
> > !
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/1
> > ip address 172.16.6.1 255.255.255.0
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > !
> > end
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > When I do a show bridge on both routers :-
> >
> > ccie-rtr7#sh bridge
> >
> > Total of 300 station blocks, 298 free
> > Codes: P - permanent, S - self
> >
> > Bridge Group 1:
> >
> > Address Action Interface Age RX count TX count
> > 0001.0386.0434 forward DLSw Port0 1 9 14
> > 0010.a400.65c1 forward Ethernet0/1 0 15 2
> > ccie-rtr7#
> >
> >
> > ccie-rtr8>sh bridge
> >
> > Total of 300 station blocks, 298 free
> > Codes: P - permanent, S - self
> >
> > Bridge Group 1:
> >
> > Address Action Interface Age RX count TX count
> > 0001.0386.0434 forward Ethernet0/1 1 6 1
> > 0010.a400.65c1 forward DLSw Port0 0 2 2
> > ccie-rtr8>
> >
> >
> >
> > And when I do a show dlsw reachability
> >
> > ccie-rtr7#sh dlsw re
> > DLSw Local MAC address reachability cache list
> > Mac Addr status Loc. port rif
> > 0008.2500.a683 FOUND LOCAL TBridge-001 --no rif--
> >
> > DLSw Remote MAC address reachability cache list
> > Mac Addr status Loc. peer
> > 0080.c061.202c FOUND REMOTE on interface Serial0/0 max-lf(516)
> >
> > DLSw Local NetBIOS Name reachability cache list
> > NetBIOS Name status Loc. port rif
> > COMPAQ-LAPTOP FOUND LOCAL TBridge-001 --no rif--
> >
> > DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list
> > NetBIOS Name status Loc. peer
> > IBM-LAPTOP FOUND REMOTE on interface Serial0/0 max-lf(516)
> >
> > ccie-rtr7#
> >
> >
> >
> > ccie-rtr8>sh dlsw re
> > DLSw Local MAC address reachability cache list
> > Mac Addr status Loc. port rif
> > 0080.c061.202c FOUND LOCAL TBridge-001 --no rif--
> >
> > DLSw Remote MAC address reachability cache list
> > Mac Addr status Loc. peer
> > 0008.2500.a683 FOUND REMOTE on interface Serial0/0
> >
> > DLSw Local NetBIOS Name reachability cache list
> > NetBIOS Name status Loc. port rif
> > IBM-LAPTOP FOUND LOCAL TBridge-001 --no rif--
> >
> > DLSw Remote NetBIOS Name reachability cache list
> > NetBIOS Name status Loc. peer
> > COMPAQ-LAPTOP FOUND REMOTE on interface Serial0/0
> >
> > ccie-rtr8>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ccie-rtr8>sh dlsw cir det
> > Index local addr(lsap) remote addr(dsap) state
> > uptime
> > 369098752 0080.c061.202c(F0) 0008.2500.a683(F0) CKT_START
> > -
> > PCEP: 8192C044 UCEP: 818EEF70
> > Port:TB1 peer on interface Serial0/0
> > Flow-Control-Tx CW:20, Permitted:0; Rx CW:20, Granted:0;
> > Op: Repeat
> > Congestion: Low(02), Flow Op: Half: 0/0 Reset 0/0
> > RIF = --no rif--
> > Bytes: 0/0 Info-frames: 0/0
> > XID-frames: 0/0 UInfo-frames: 0/0
> > ccie-rtr8>sh dlsw peer
> > Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts
> > TCP uptime
> > LLC2 Se0/0 110 CONNECT 133 131 conf 0 1
> > - 00:49:33
> > Total number of connected peers: 1
> > Total number of connections: 1
> >
> > ccie-rtr8>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> For more information about Barclays Capital, please
> visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
>
>
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
> Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
> message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes,
> it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is
> caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are
> solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
> the Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the
> Barclays Group for operational or business reasons.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:09 GMT-3