RE: Unicast RIP

From: Ozgur Guler (Garanti Teknoloji) (OzgurG@garanti.com.tr)
Date: Thu Aug 28 2003 - 03:32:32 GMT-3


neigbor in eigrp works different...
if you give neighbor under eigrp,
router no longer listens for multicast eigrp hellos.
it only listens for and originates unicast hello packets.
so neighboring router should also have the neighbor statement defined.
to have eigrp neighborship up.

passive interface stops eigrp processing on that interface...
not like rip.

Vzg|r G|ler
Garanti Teknoloji
]nternet ve Yaz}l}m Hizmetleri
Ofis: 90.212.4783425
Fax: 90.212.6576150
ozgurg@garanti.com.tr
www.garantiteknoloji.com.tr

-----Original Message-----
From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com [mailto:wing_lam@jossynergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:41 AM
To: miken; Larry Cain
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Unicast RIP

Hi all,

I have the similar question but it's asking EIGRP, can EIGRP do the same? I
have the similar config as the one Larry does but replaced by EIGRP, but
it's not success.

I just want to confirm whether EIGRP can use unicast instead of multicast?

Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)

                                                                                                                                      
                      "miken"
                      <miken@sisna.com> To: "Larry Cain" <l_u_cain@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
                      Sent by: cc:
                      nobody@groupstudy Subject: Re: Unicast RIP
                      .com
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      
                      08/28/2003 06:05
                      AM
                      Please respond to
                      "miken"
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      

Larry,

Yes, that is how I would configure it to satisfy the requirement. Don't
miss
the "needs RIPv2" part of it. Add version 2 under router rip:

router rip
version 2

Thanks,
Mike N

----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Cain" <l_u_cain@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Unicast RIP

> Hi
>
> Have a requirement that needs RIPv2 between 2 routers on a LAN.
> Only these routers are to exchange routing info and do it via Unicast not
> Multi or Broadcast.
>
> Will the neighbor command work for this scenario?
>
>
> r1--------------e1----------------r2
> 10.108.20.1 10.108.20.2
>
> !r1
> router rip
> network 10.108.0.0
> passive-interface ethernet 1
> neighbor 10.108.20.2
>
> !r2
> router rip
> network 10.108.0.0
> passive-interface ethernet 1
> neighbor 10.108.20.1
>
> Or is there another way?
>
> Kind regards
> Larry
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tired of 56k? Get a FREE BT Broadband connection
> http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:08 GMT-3