From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Aug 27 2003 - 13:38:11 GMT-3
What's the accumulative limit?
--- asadovnikov <asadovnikov@comcast.net> wrote:
> There is actually an accumulative limit for WFQ.
> Packets are tale dropped
> from a flow-queue which has reached its depth or
> from all queues if the
> accumulative limit has been reached.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexei
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> wsqccie@hotmail.com
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:54 AM
> To: Peng Zheng
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: How much queue length for Cisco Router?
>
>
> For WFQ, there are 16 queue list, and every queue
> length is 64, which can be
> 4096 max
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> To: <wsqccie@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:08 PM
> Subject: Re: How much queue length for Cisco Router?
>
>
> > But becasue all traffic share the link. I need to
> > know what's the maximum queue length for a link.
> >
> >
> > --- wsqccie@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > WFQ default is 64
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:21 AM
> > > Subject: How much queue length for Cisco Router?
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'm wondering what's the queue length for
> Cisco
> > > Router
> > > > by default. Namely, what's the maximum queue
> delay
> > > in
> > > > a Cisco Router in general?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web
> site
> > > design software
> > > > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:07 GMT-3