From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@fastmail.fm)
Date: Fri Aug 22 2003 - 13:55:57 GMT-3
Has anyone had problems with the PIX closing a tcp socket on a static nat
due to inactivity/timeout? I am dealing with an application which may
legitimatly leave the socket open for hours, and if it hides behind the
PIX, there are problems with the first connetion when the session has
been idle for several hours.
I am thinking about increasing the global timeout for NAT, but I don't
know if it will have other ramifications.
Tony Pace CCIE #10349
> Anthony Pace
anthonypace@fastmail.fm
>
> --
> http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web
-- Anthony Pace anthonypace@fastmail.fm-- http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about a decent email service?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:04 GMT-3