Re: IPv6 inclusion in Lab

From: Cristian Henry H (chenry@reuna.cl)
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 12:50:47 GMT-3

I have the similar setup: R1 <--> SwCat3550 with VLAN <---> R2

R1:
interface FastEthernet0/0
 description -->Red de Backbone IPv6
 ip address 146.83.245.25 255.255.255.248
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 ipv6 address 3FFE:400F:1:1::1/64
 ipv6 enable
!
R2:

interface FastEthernet0/0
 description -->Red de Backbone IPv6
 ip address 146.83.245.27 255.255.255.248
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 ipv6 address 3FFE:400F:1:1::3/64
 ipv6 enable
!

R1#ping ipv6 3FFE:400F:1:1::3

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 3FFE:400F:1:1::3, timeout is 2
seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms
R1#

R2651XM with IOS 12.2(11)T

Look in your router the sh ipv6 int f0/0:

R1#sh ipv6 int f0/0
FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
  IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::20A:8AFF:FE5E:1DC0
  Description: -->Red de Backbone IPv6
  Global unicast address(es):
    3FFE:400F:1:1::1, subnet is 3FFE:400F:1:1::/64
  Joined group address(es):
    FF02::1
    FF02::2
    FF02::1:FF5E:1DC0
    FF02::1:FF00:1
  MTU is 1500 bytes
  ICMP error messages limited to one every 100 milliseconds
  ICMP redirects are enabled
  ND DAD is enabled, number of DAD attempts: 1
  ND reachable time is 30000 milliseconds
  ND advertised reachable time is 0 milliseconds
  ND advertised retransmit interval is 0 milliseconds
  ND router advertisements are sent every 200 seconds
  ND router advertisements live for 1800 seconds
  Hosts use stateless autoconfig for addresses.

wing_lam@jossynergy.com ha escrito:
>
> Hi all;
>
> Heard so much about IPv6 so I lab it up but fail:
>
> My image is 12.2(15)T5.
>
> R5----Cat 2924----R8
>
> R5:
> ipv6 unicast-routing
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 192.168.2.4 255.255.255.0
> ipv6 address 200A:0:0:2::2/64
> ipv6 enable
>
> R8:
> ipv6 unicast-routing
> ip address 192.168.2.8 255.255.255.0
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ipv6 address 200A:0:0:2::1/64
> ipv6 enable
>
> I even can't make as simple as PING to work; but R5 can ping R8 for IPv4. I
> "debug ipv6 icmp" in R8 but no any comes out. But each router can IPv6 ping
> itself. The following is the PING and route table.
>
> R5#ping ipv
> Target IPv6 address: 200A::2:0:0:0:1
> Repeat count [5]:
> Datagram size [100]:
> Timeout in seconds [2]:
> Extended commands? [no]:
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 200A:0:0:2::1, timeout is 2 seconds:
>
> .Mar 6 10:25:58.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
> .Mar 6 10:26:00.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
> .Mar 6 10:26:02.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
> .Mar 6 10:26:04.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
> .Mar 6 10:26:06.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
> Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
> R5#
>
> R5#sh ipv ro 200A:0:0:2::1
> IPv6 Routing Table - 4 entries
> Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
> U - Per-user Static route
> I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea
> O - OSPF intra, OI - OSPF inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
> C 200A:0:0:2::/64 [0/0]
> via ::, FastEthernet0/0
> R5#sh ipv ro 200A:0:0:2::2
> IPv6 Routing Table - 4 entries
> Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
> U - Per-user Static route
> I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea
> O - OSPF intra, OI - OSPF inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
> L 200A:0:0:2::2/128 [0/0]
> via ::, FastEthernet0/0
>
> R8#sh ipv ro 200A:0:0:2::2
> IPv6 Routing Table - 4 entries
> Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
> U - Per-user Static route
> I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea
> O - OSPF intra, OI - OSPF inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
> C 200A:0:0:2::/64 [0/0]
> via ::, FastEthernet0/0
>
> Do the switch need to support IPv6 also? WIll it don't understand 0x86DD?
> Am I missed something?
>
> Thx,
> BBD (Big Black Dog)
>
>
> Cristian Henry H
> <chenry@reuna.cl> To: Todd Carswell <acarswell@nc.rr.com>
> Sent by: cc: John Matijevic <matijevi@bellsouth.net>, ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>, Group
> nobody@groupstudy Study <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> .com Subject: Re: IPv6 inclusion in Lab
>
>
> 08/19/2003 10:39
> PM
> Please respond to
> Cristian Henry H
>
>
>
> I'm working on it, our national network has a IPv6 native peer MBBG with
> Internet2 network with production IPv6 numbers, also we have a pTLA /32
> from 6bone group to testing internally. IOS 12.2(8)T over a 7500
> plataform. The unique routing protocol I've configured with IPv6 is
> MBGP, it works fine. RIP has some troubles.
>
> Todd Carswell ha escrito:
> >
> > This leads to a question... Is anyone out there implementing IPv6 in
> > production?
> >
> > Todd
> >
> > John Matijevic wrote:
> >
> > >CCIE2be,
> > >IPV6 functionality is in 12.2, and since there seems to be so much
> > >documentation on it, I would plan on learning it. I am planning to
> learn as
> > >much as possible for IPV6, and if is included in major protocols, could
> be
> > >worth a lot more than a few points. The good news is we will be the
> first
> > >one hired for IPV6 projects that come up in the future. The bad news is
> that
> > >again there is a lot of information to learn. But I would learn this
> > >technology not only for the exam but for real world. IPV6 is nothing new
> > >this technology has been around for at least 5 years maybe longer. Now
> the
> > >IOS is starting to support it with 12.2, I imagine by 12.3 you will have
> > >full support of it, and thats when the companies, will implement it.
> There
> > >is a lot of documentation on this that should not be taken lightly.
> > >Sincerely,
> > >Matijevic
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
> > >To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:33 AM
> > >Subject: IPv6 inclusion in Lab
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>Facts:
> > >>
> > >>1) On Sept. 1, the lab will be running version IOS 12.2 (which
> release?
> > >>unknown)
> > >>
> > >>2) IOS 12.2(T) supports IPv6
> > >>
> > >>Does that mean that IPv6 is on the lab? I don't know but I can't
> imagine
> > >>
> > >>
> > >that
> > >
> > >
> > >>if it is it will be worth more than a few points or that correctly
> > >>
> > >>
> > >configuring
> > >
> > >
> > >>other technologies will be dependant on a thorough knowledge of IPv6.
> > >>
> > >>That's just my opinion - but I would like to hear what others think.
> dt
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________________________________
> > >>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >>
> > >>Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> --
> Cristian E. Henry
> REUNA
>
> E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
> Fono: 56-2-3370336
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html 

-- 
Cristian E. Henry
REUNA

E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
Fono: 56-2-3370336

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:03 GMT-3