From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 00:37:03 GMT-3
Thanks, Paul. This helps. I'm running out of time.
Danny
-----Original Message-----
From: pauldongso [mailto:pauldongso@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:33 PM
To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IP pim sparse-mode or sparse-dense-mode?
My rules are:
In the lab:
If to use sparse-mode, must static RP
If to use auto-RP, must use sparse-dense-mode.
In real world,
Always use sparse-dense-mode
Regards,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Sent: Tuesday, 19 August 2003 12:08 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IP pim sparse-mode or sparse-dense-mode?
Hello, Group. Sparse-mode means low number of MC host compared to the total number of hosts. Sparse-dense-mode allows the router to operate in both modes. I think I'm correct there.
What I am having a hard time understanding is when to use the one or the other. Any guidelines that I can follow? in this lab I was doing, I used sparse-mode and the final says sparse-dense-mode. I'd hate to lose these points for not being sure.
Also, what is the purpose of running pim on a loopback? This is not a transit interface or an interface that can have hosts of off it. Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Danny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:02 GMT-3