Re: Re: Unicast update of EIGRP is possible??

From: Darren Ward (dward@pla.net.au)
Date: Mon Aug 18 2003 - 01:35:21 GMT-3


What IP addresses are you using on the serial interfaces?

It looks like you've configured the same peer on each router rather than
the IP address of the peer.

Darren

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 wwwjjang@chol.com wrote:

> Hi..John..
> Thaks for your kind reply
>
> i change the configuration you suggested.
> But it don't work well too !!
>
> How can i fix this problem ??? Help me !!!
>
> Here is my configuration & results..
>
>
> R1>
> router eigrp 100
> network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
> network 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255
> neighbor 2.2.2.2 serial 0 **
>
> => 19:26:47: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP 100 neighbor 2.2.2.2 (Serial0) is
> down: Static peer configured
>
> R1#sh ip eigrp neighbors =>Neighbor is not established !!!
> IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 100
>
> On R2,
>
> R2#
> 13:56:41: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP 100: Neighbor 2.2.2.2(Serial0) is down: Remote peer static/dynamic
>
> R2#sh ip eigrp neighbors =>Neighbor is not established !!!
> IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 100
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:00 GMT-3