From: Chen Kwong Wai William (kwchen@netvigator.com)
Date: Fri Aug 15 2003 - 13:30:54 GMT-3
Hi,
I am sure that the traced route is missing in the BGP table, but it is
still in the IGP table.
Therefore, whether the conditional advertisement traced the IGP or BGP
table?
Best Regards,
William
----- Original Message -----
From: "R&S Groupstudy" <rsg@synergy-networking.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "'Chen Kwong Wai William'"
<kwchen@netvigator.com>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 9:45 PM
Subject: RE: BGP conditional advertisement
> There is probably nothing wrong with your configuration.
> The BGP Conditional Advertisement feature is based on the nonexistence of
a
> prefix and the advertisement of another.
> Since you see your advertisement being "Uninitialized", then I think that
> the route you are watching, is already in the table.....
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Chen Kwong Wai William[SMTP:kwchen@netvigator.com]
> > Reply To: Chen Kwong Wai William
> > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 1:30 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: BGP conditional advertisement
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I try to configure the BGP conditional advertisement, and I got the
> > following message after I finish the configuration:
> >
> > RouterA#b nei | in Condition
> > Condition-map primary, Advertise-map secondary, status:
Uninitialized
> >
> > Do you know what is going wrong?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > William
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:59 GMT-3