From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Aug 15 2003 - 11:58:35 GMT-3
Could you post your configs? dt
----- Original Message -----
From: "benmekki kamal" <benmekki_kamal@yahoo.fr>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: bgp synchronization problem
> Hi,
>
> R1-------------------- IBGP----------------------R4
> R1-------RIP--------R3----------OSPF--------R4
>
> BGP is configured on R1 and R4 only on the same AS 135
>
> bgp synchronization is enabled on R1 and R4
>
> R3 is performing double redistribution between RIP and OSPF
>
> R4 gets ibgp routes from R1
> R4 knows about thoses routes via OSPF
> R4 does not sychronize the route.
>
> R4:
> sh ip bgp 20.20.20.0
> BGP routing table entry for 20.20.20.0/24, version 0
> Paths: (1 available, no best path)
> Not advertised to any peer
> 1, (received & used)
> 135.1.1.1 (metric 20) from 135.1.1.1 (135.1.1.1)
> Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, not
synchronized
>
>
> R4
> R4#sh ip route 20.20.20.0
> Routing entry for 20.20.20.0/24
> Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20
> Tag 1, type extern 2, forward metric 64
> Last update from 135.1.34.3 on Serial2/0.1, 00:36:06 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 135.1.34.3, from 135.1.3.3, 00:36:06 ago, via Serial2/0.1
> Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1
>
>
> N.B. in case I have only one IGP running ( OSPF for example between
routes ) , sychronization is performed.
>
> Is there some restrictions about double IGPs into the same AS ?
>
> Any idea ?
> TIA
> Kamal
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en frangais !
> Testez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:59 GMT-3