From: Charles Church (cchurch@wamnet.com)
Date: Wed Aug 13 2003 - 12:16:50 GMT-3
Raj,
HSRP has hello and dead timers that can be changed to decrease the
fail-over time. Lowering the keepalive interval on a tracked interface can
speed that up as well. So I wouldn't necessarily say that VRRP has a speed
advantage over HSRP.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@wamnet.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=chuck+church&op=index
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Rajagopal S
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:31 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: HSRP / VRRP
Hi ,
As far as LAN redundancy is concerned, we had been using HSRP between
two routers. By this, In case the first router fails, it takes around
10-15 secs for the LAN to come up on the standby router.
I have studied in Cisco documents that VRRP can almost instantaneously
bring up the LAN on the standby router (in case the primary router
fails !! ) . Has anybody tested this ?
Is there any other difference (other than command sets) between HSRP
and VRRP ?
Cheers
Raj
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:58 GMT-3