From: MMoniz (ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sun Aug 10 2003 - 19:26:15 GMT-3
This is an answer from a proctor about a yr. ago on another post.
Is it true that Security track is no more graded by a live proctor
but an automated script ?
2. Also what has been the success rate of candidates for CCIE
Security in the last 2 months. (in other words how many people
have passed in last 60 days
All lab tests, Routing/Switching, Security and C&S are all graded by live
proctors. There may
be a few tools to assist with the many pings, and show commands that a
proctor can
employ but proctors do our grading.
Security Pass Rate ranges from 32 to 34 percent over the last 2 months
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jason Cash
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 6:06 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Superfluous lab config
It is my understand the each lab is graded by a script checking to see if
necessary commands are present and testing pings, etc. My question is how
are superfluous commands looked upon. For instance, if you block
route-loops via route-maps, which would not be needed. Technically, that
would not be wrong just unneccessary.
Just curious because I was doing some scenarios and it involved multiple
redist points of EIGRP and OSPF. The solution had:
R5:
router ospf 1
redistribute eigrp 100 subnets route-map e2o
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1
Whereas I had:
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 route-map o2e
default-metric 1544 2000 255 1 1500
!
router ospf 1
redistribute eigrp 100 subnets route-map e2o
route-map o2e deny 10
match tag 90
!
route-map o2e permit 20
set tag 110
!
route-map e2o deny 10
match tag 110
!
route-map e2o permit 20
set tag 90
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:57 GMT-3