RE: DLSW - syntax placement

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sat Aug 09 2003 - 23:12:27 GMT-3


It's always results oriented on the lab, unless something is asked in a
specific fashion...

Without going over that exciting NDA discussion, the only thing I could
advise would be to know how to do it both ways, and know why you may
want to do it one way or the other.... Then read the
questions/scenarios carefully and you may see something leap out at you!

Best of luck!

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jason Cash
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:09 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW - syntax placement

when defining dlsw parameters, what is the best practice in regard to
cost, passive, etc. placement? Meaning, should one always place cost,
passive in the local-peer peer id or is it better to do it on the
remote-peer statement? I am curious if one would be considered
incorrect on the lab.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:57 GMT-3