From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Aug 09 2003 - 16:50:01 GMT-3
On r4, under rip
distance 109 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 2
I know it try to prevent route loop.
But even without it, ospf routes don't install in
routing table.
in ospf data on r4:
Type-5 AS External Link States
200.0.0.0 150.1.4.4 452 0x80000003
0x95C8 0
200.1.0.0 150.1.4.4 452 0x80000005
0x961D 0
200.2.0.0 150.1.4.4 453 0x80000003
0x7DDE 0
200.3.0.0 150.1.4.4 453 0x80000005
0x7E33 0
200.4.0.0 150.1.4.4 453 0x80000003
0x65F4 0
200.5.0.0 150.1.4.4 453 0x80000005
0x6649 0
200.6.0.0 150.1.4.4 453 0x80000003
0x4D0B 0
200.7.0.0 150.1.4.4 453 0x80000005
0x4E5F 0
220.1.0.0 150.1.2.2 805 0x80000001
0x37EF 0
But in routing table:
R 200.0.0.0/24 [120/1] via 170.1.1.254, 00:00:05,
Ethernet0
R 200.1.0.0/24 [120/1] via 170.1.1.254, 00:00:05,
Ethernet0
R 200.2.0.0/24 [120/1] via 170.1.1.254, 00:00:05,
Ethernet0
R 200.3.0.0/24 [120/1] via 170.1.1.254, 00:00:05,
Ethernet0
R 200.4.0.0/24 [120/1] via 170.1.1.254, 00:00:05,
Ethernet0
R 200.5.0.0/24 [120/1] via 170.1.1.254, 00:00:05,
Ethernet0
R 200.6.0.0/24 [120/1] via 170.1.1.254, 00:00:06,
Ethernet0
R 200.7.0.0/24 [120/1] via 170.1.1.254, 00:00:06,
Ethernet0
-------------------------------------
Why these routes are not installed in routing table
while OSPF have smaller distance?
Thanks.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:56 GMT-3