Re: CBWFQ configurations

From: Cristian Henry H (chenry@reuna.cl)
Date: Wed Aug 06 2003 - 11:42:07 GMT-3

• Next message: John Hopkins: "Dialer Watch with Dialer Maps. Why does it only work with"
• Previous message: Charles Church: "RE: Custom Queueing - ONCE AND FOR ALL"
• Maybe in reply to: Lam Binh: "CBWFQ configurations"
• Next in thread: Nguyen Hoang Long: "Re: CBWFQ configurations"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I think the second one is the best.

Lam Binh ha escrito:
>
> Hello Groups,
>
> I would like to confirm whether my solution is correct or not.
>
> The requirement to configure CBWFQ as follows:
>
> - User in network 10.10.10.0/24 will get 20% BW
> - FTP traffic will get 10% BW
> - Voice traffic will get 40% BW
> - All of the remain traffic will use the remain of the BW
>
> I have two solution of configurations as:
>
> 1.
> class-map match-all Voice
> match access-group 102
> class-map match-all ftp
> match protocol ftp
> class-map match-all net10
> match access-group 101
>
> policy-map cbwfq
> class voice
> bandwidth percent 40
> class net10
> bandwidth percent 20
> class ftp
> bandwidth percent 10
> class class-default
> bandwidth percent 35
>
>
> access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 any
> access-list 102 permit udp any any range 16384 32767
> access-list 102 permit udp any range 16384 32767 any
>
> int se0/0
> service-policy output cbwfq
> max-reserved-bandwidth 100
>
> 2.
> class-map match-all Voice
> match access-group 102
> class-map match-all ftp
> match protocol ftp
> class-map match-all net10
> match access-group 101
>
> policy-map cbwfq
> class voice
> bandwidth percent 40
> class net10
> bandwidth percent 20
> class ftp
> bandwidth percent 10
>
> access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 any
> access-list 102 permit udp any any range 16384 32767
> access-list 102 permit udp any range 16384 32767 any
>
> int se0/0
> service-policy output cbwfq
> max-reserved-bandwidth 70
>
> Please advise both above methods are correct or not to meet the
> requirements?
> Which one is referable?
>
> thank you in advance!
>
> Lam Binh
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

-- 
Cristian E. Henry
REUNA
E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
Fono: 56-2-3370336

• Next message: John Hopkins: "Dialer Watch with Dialer Maps. Why does it only work with"
• Previous message: Charles Church: "RE: Custom Queueing - ONCE AND FOR ALL"
• Maybe in reply to: Lam Binh: "CBWFQ configurations"
• Next in thread: Nguyen Hoang Long: "Re: CBWFQ configurations"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:54 GMT-3