From: Tony Schaffran (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 16:42:05 GMT-3
I think he was asking, why would you use the interface and an IP address in
the static route? Not, why would you use a static route?
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
http://www.cconlinelabs.com/
Your #1 choice for online cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ajit
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Oliver Ziltener; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: Oliver Ziltener
Subject: Re: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fastethernet0/0 192.168.100.1
the ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fastethernet0/0 192.168.100.1one is preferred
because you are specifying the next hop address ..will reduce ARPing
(because when you dont specify the next hop address, the router has to use
the destination ip address in the packet and ARP out to get the next hop
address.
So when yu supply this in the static route, you actually save that ARPing
process.
hope that helps !!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oliver Ziltener" <ziltener@netcloud.ch>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "Oliver Ziltener" <ziltener@netcloud.ch>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:56 PM
Subject: Q: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fastethernet0/0 192.168.100.1
> I think everybody knows the diffenence between the both lines
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fastethernet0/0
>
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.1
>
> but both together ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fastethernet0/0 192.168.100.1?
> I which situation is a need for this?
>
> Oliver
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:51 GMT-3