From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 09:19:29 GMT-3
Hi Mustafa Bayramov,
Do you mean ISIS in p2m or physical can work in 12.2? What type of ISIS
hello will it send? p2p IIH? or LAN IIH?
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
"Mustafa Bayramov
(ICT/IT)" To: Jonathan V Hays <jhays@jtan.com>, wing_lam@jossynergy.com,
<mustafa@azercell ccielab@groupstudy.com
.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: ISIS neighbor
nobody@groupstudy
.com
07/31/2003 04:47
PM
Please respond to
"Mustafa Bayramov
(ICT/IT)"
John
It should work
R1 L1 only
R2 L1/L2 only
R3 L2 only
Physical layout - All router in one VLAN.
R1 will have adj. with R2 L1
R2 will have adj. with R1 L1 and with R3 L2.
If you have HUB and SPOKE topology and physical or p2m interface you can't
do it on 12.1. on p2p to each spoke you can , or HUB and one spoke router.
Regards
Mustafa M Bayramov
CISSP
CCNP,CCDP,Cisco Security Specialist
Network engineer and security analyst
"I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance." Socrates
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jonathan V Hays
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:54 AM
To: wing_lam@jossynergy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ISIS neighbor
Interesting problem. I tried something similar recently and was not able
to get it to work unless both spokes were the same type. These were my
results.
L1--L1/L2--L1 Works okay
L2--L1/L2--L2 Works okay
L1--L1/L2--L2 Will NOT work
Was I missing something in my config?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:33 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ISIS neighbor
Hi Group,
With the following scenario:
R1, R2, R3 on the same subnet,
When the question asking you to do:
a) establish a R1--R2 L1 neighbor
b) establish a R2--R3 L2 neighbor
c) There should be no any neighbor relationship between R1 & R3
I think it will be no problem for anybody in a) & b), but for c), I can
think of two fast solution:
1) Set R1 as L1 only, R3 as L2 only
2) Set link authentication for R3's L1
The question is open; (i.e. no request you to do any authentication or
limitation)
Which one is better? Or some other better solutions?
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use
of
the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original
message.
Thank you.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:59 GMT-3