From: George Yiannibas (hintgy@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 03:22:06 GMT-3
Hi all,
From Cisco site :
"Before requesting a reread, candidates should consider the fact that, since
the practice of rereads was begun in January 2002, it has resulted in only
.3% of exams being changed from a Fail to a Pass."
Zac is right, a rescore is a waste of money. If Cisco says you failed you
failed end of story. Sorry if I sound harsh but I recently failed and I know
what it feels like.
Regards
George
2nd attempt August 19 Brussels
>From: "Zachary Hinz" <z_hinz@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Zachary Hinz" <z_hinz@hotmail.com>
>To: badger@pongo.org, dcresley@yahoo.com
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: ccie Lab grading
>Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:22:30 -0500
>
>In my personal opinion, I think it is a freakin' joke that a rescore is
>even an option.
>
>A.) The test cost $1250 + and trip.
>B.) Isn't this supposed to be the most prestigious networking
>certification around?
>
>At least make us believe that 99.9% of the time it is being scored
>correctly. Can you call the Bar Association and ask them to rescore the
>test that were really confident you passed?
>
>Zac
>
>>From: badger <badger@pongo.org>
>>Reply-To: badger <badger@pongo.org>
>>To: "Cresley Dansen" <dcresley@yahoo.com>
>>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: Re: ccie Lab grading
>>Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:45:10 -0700
>>
>>Hello Cresley,
>>
>>Tuesday, July 29, 2003, 3:36:02 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>CD> Hi, all,
>>
>>CD> I attempted the lab yesterday. Thought I did well. But the results
>>CD> came out totally different. I even got a low score on IGP for which
>>CD> I verified that everything worked. Really weird ...
>>
>>CD> Did anyone have the same experience? I suspect they might
>>CD> have graded someone else's rack. Is this possible?
>>
>>CD> I wrote to ccie-lab@cisco.com already. But no response.
>>
>>CD> Thanks for any suggestion!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:58 GMT-3