Re[2]: About ATM CLIP

From: badger (badger@pongo.org)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 11:26:39 GMT-3


Hello William,

Monday, July 28, 2003, 10:15:20 PM, you wrote:

WL> Yes you need to use a multipoint sub. It will not let you use an SVC under
WL> a point-to-point sub. The best way to think about it is that you are going
WL> to go to multiple destinations. First you have to go to the ARP Server,
WL> then you have to go to your final destination. There isn't just a single
WL> point that you will always go to so it must be multipoint.

WL> Bill Lijewski
WL> CCIE #8642

>>From: badger <badger@pongo.org>
>>Reply-To: badger <badger@pongo.org>
>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: About ATM CLIP
>>Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:26:01 -0700
>>
>>Hello ccielab,
>>
>> Is a multipoint interface a must when doing atm clip ?
>>
>>--
>>Best regards,
>> badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>>
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

WL> _________________________________________________________________
WL> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
WL> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

WL> _______________________________________________________________________
WL> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.

WL> Subscription information may be found at:
WL> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Doh! Thanks...SVCs didn't really occur to me.

-- 
Best regards,
 badger                            mailto:badger@pongo.org


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:57 GMT-3