From: John Matijevic (matijevi@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 12:11:22 GMT-3
Hello Wing,
There is no need here for a virtual-link in this case, becuase as long as
you have an interface that is attatched to Area0, which you do in this case.
I am a little unclear on what you mean to enhance the resilience. I hope
this answers your question.
Sincerely,
Matijevic
----- Original Message -----
From: <wing_lam@jossynergy.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:54 AM
Subject: OSPF virtual link
> Hi group,
>
> I am working on an OSPF question, the scenario as following:
>
> Area 0
> ------R1---------------R2-------
> Area 1 | Area 2
> |
> R3
>
> That means R1 an ABR of area 0 and 1, R2 is ABR of area 0 and 2, R3 is ABR
> of area 1 and 2.
>
> The question is just to establish connectivity but no other request.
>
> Should I also establish the two virtual link (R2--R3 for area 1, R1--R3
for
> area 2); so that to enhance the resilience which the question itself
hasn't
> request to do so?
>
> Thx,
> BBD (Big Black Dog)
>
> DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
> immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
> Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:55 GMT-3