From: Brown, Patrick (NSOC-OCF} (PBrown4@chartercom.com)
Date: Fri Jul 25 2003 - 21:57:17 GMT-3
Yes, Class Based marking on the ingress with CBWFQ on the egress interfaces
bidirectional. Optional LLQ if links under high utilization and app is time
critical. Use the command "qos pre-classify" if supported on the platform.
This will allow the router to match protocols/ports on a granular basis. If
not, all traffic will be classified as either IPSEC or GRE. Enable "qos
pre-classify" on tunnel and IPSec crypto map.
Beware of BUG's: CSCds37028 | CSCdt41744
HTH
Patrick B
-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Ziltener
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: Oliver Ziltener
Sent: 7/25/2003 6:38 PM
Subject: Slight offtopic: Create QoS with IPsec and GRE
Hello all
sorry for the offtopic question...
I have a customer with a hub and spoke IPsec/GRE Networks. We have to
use
GRE, because we run eigrp to the spokes.
On the central site is a time critical application (SAP) and some other
preferred traffic (smtp/pop).
All spokes has a ADSL interface on a small router (830 or 1720) has a to
directly to the internet for www and so on.
What is the best way to reserve bandwidth for application X and Y.
Im thinking CBWFQ will fit best, agree?
Does CBWFQ works well with GRE Tunnels?
thanks for any feedback
Oliver
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:54 GMT-3