From: Andriy Lysyuk (lysyuk@ics.ua)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2003 - 07:43:05 GMT-3
Hello Tim.
In fact you must get rid of /32 routes in order to prevent OSPF routing
protocol from flapping the dial link.
The problem is showing with two different routing protocols OSPF and
RIP.
But you can achive that goal with alternative sollutions:
Solution 1: Use the no peer neighbor-route Command
Solution 2: Use the route-map Command and deny /32
Solution 3: Use a Different Major Net for either the RIP or OSPF domain
See the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk365/tk480/technologies_tech_no
te09186a008009481b.shtml
Andriy Lysyuk
System engineer
JS Informational Computer Systems
****************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Snow, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:44 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: IP Expert lab 29 - ISDN
Hey All...
The last requirement for IP expert lab 29, they're asking to do OSPF
demand circuit over ISDN with CHAP. That wasn't difficult. The last
statement of the requirement was "Do not use the command "no peer
neighbor-route" on either routers.
Since the requirements state that I have to do CHAP, that means I have
to do PPP. I was thinking maybe HDLC over the ISDN. Without that peer
neighbor-route command, I haven't been able to figure out a way to get
rid of the /32 route.
I also tried a "dialer map ip x.x.x.x" where x.x.x.x was the actual
subnet instead of the 32 bit address of the neighbor and my ISDN
wouldn't dial (but it works with the /32 mapped) Is this correct or am
I missing something.
Any comments on the requirement or the dialer-map question would be
greatly appreciated.
Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:48 GMT-3