Re: BUSY-MESSAGE

From: Vazman@aol.com
Date: Mon Jul 21 2003 - 23:35:43 GMT-3

• Next message: Rivalino YMT.: "Re: Voice Prioritization"
• Previous message: Peng Zheng: "RE: route not synchronized"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Needham \(mineedha\): "BUSY-MESSAGE"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Why would you need to use the "busy-message" in a production environment. It
seems like a lot of work to implement with very little benefit.

• Next message: Rivalino YMT.: "Re: Voice Prioritization"
• Previous message: Peng Zheng: "RE: route not synchronized"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Needham \(mineedha\): "BUSY-MESSAGE"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:48 GMT-3