Re: CBWFQ/WRED for ATM PVC/SVC

From: beda jain (bpjain@cisco.com)
Date: Mon Jul 21 2003 - 14:11:59 GMT-3


you have to use vtr-rt for cbwfq.

thanks,
Beda
At 08:42 PM 7/21/2003 +0400, Mustafa Bayramov (ICT/IT) wrote:
>Hello folks
>
> I have read on doc CD that I couldn't use CBWFQ on PVC that configured as
>UBR or UBR+.
> Does it apply to all IOS 12.1.x version ?
>
>
>"
>Attaching a Service Policy and Enabling CBWFQ for a VC
>Because CBWFQ gives you minimum bandwidth guarantee, you can only apply
>CBWFQ to VCs having these classes of service: available bit rate (ABR) and
>variable bit rate (VBR). You cannot apply per-VC WFQ and CBWFQ to UBR and
>UBR+ VCs because both of these service classes are best-effort classes that
>do not guarantee minimum bandwidth. When CBWFQ is enabled for a VC, all
>classes configured as part of the service policy are installed in the fair
>queueing system.
>"
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1830/products_feature_guid
>e09186a0080087a82.html
>
>
>Second question
>
>Can I configure CBWFQ for physical interface or I should do it only per VC?
>Same question for WRED.
>
>
>
>
>
>Mustafa M Bayramov
>
>CISSP
>CCNP ,CCDP, Cisco Security Specialist
>Network engineer and security analyst
>
>Azercell Telecom J.V.
>
>Azerbaijan, 370620 Baku, Tbilisi pr. 31/66
>Tel: (99412) 982823 /982740 Ext: 34 03
>Fax: (+99412) 982825 / 93 73 63
>Mob: (+99450) 2500011
>E-mail: mustafa@azercell.com
>url: http://www.azercell.com
>
>
>
>"I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance." Socrates
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:47 GMT-3