Re: route not synchronized

From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Jul 21 2003 - 13:54:46 GMT-3


But that route is directly connected to r6. I can
only redistributing it from r6.

--- William Lijewski <ccie8642@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Is there some reason why you are redistributing the
> route into OSPF on R6?
> The router that you redistribute the BGP into the
> OSPF will be the origin
> for the OSPF. If you redistribute on R5 then R5
> will show as the origin of
> the route for OSPF, and your BGP and OSPF router IDs
> will match up on R13.
>
> Bill Lijewski
> CCIE #8642
>
>
> >From: Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> >Reply-To: Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: route not synchronized
> >Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Connection:
> > area 0
> > R5------R13
> > |
> > |(area 1)
> > |
> > R6 (area 2)
> >
> >
> >R6 in AS 10, R5 and R13 in AS 20.
> >
> >All of them run OSPF. Virtual link has been
> configured
> >between R5 and R6.
> >
> >Router-id for OSPF and BGP on all routers are same.
> >For r5, it's 129.5.5.5. For r6, it 129.6.6.6. For
> r13,
> >it's 129.13.13.13.
> >
> >On r6, a network 62.9.1.0/24 is redistributerd into
> >OSPF.
> >
> >I redistributed OSPF routes (included all kinds of
> >routes) from R5 into BGP. But 62.9.1.0 are not
> >synchronized on r13.
> >
> >------------------------------
> >show ip route 62.9.1.0/24 on r13:
> >
> >Routing entry for 62.9.1.0/24
> > Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20,
> type
> >extern 2, forward metric 128
> >
> > Last update from 192.168.1.5 on Serial0,
> 00:36:02
> >ago
> > Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> > * 192.168.1.5, from 129.6.6.6, 00:36:02 ago, via
> >Serial0
> > Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1
> >-------------------------------------
> >sh ip bgp 62.9.1.0
> >
> >BGP routing table entry for 62.9.1.0/24, version 0
> >Paths: (1 available, no best path)
> > Not advertised to any peer
> > Local
> > 192.168.1.5 from 192.168.1.5 (129.5.5.5)
> > Origin incomplete, metric 30, localpref 100,
> >valid, internal, not synchronized
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------
> >
> >I noticed OSPF learned it from r6 and BGP learned
> it
> >from r5. So they are not synchronized.
> >
> >My question is if it's possible to make the route
> >synchronized.
> >
> >
> >Thanks for any reply.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> >http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
> >You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S
> Discussion Group.
> >
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:47 GMT-3