From: asadovnikov (asadovnikov@comcast.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 2003 - 02:05:55 GMT-3
I like this explanation.
On the newer IOS you can as well use NBAR "match protocol rtp ..." for this
purpose.
Best regards,
Alexei
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Snow, Tim
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:20 AM
To: 'Rivalino YMT.'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Voice and Data packet in CBWFQ
Assuming that your voice traffic is marked with a precedence of 5, then yes,
your solution will work. However, you'll also be putting any other traffic
that's marked with critical in that same class.
I prefer to use an ACL matching ports 16384 through 32767 for RTP. Keep in
mind that will get the RTP and RTCP port numbers. You might also want to
put tcp port 1720 in the "control" secion as it's used for h323 call setup.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Rivalino YMT. [mailto:rivel131@cyberlib.itb.ac.id]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:22 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Voice and Data packet in CBWFQ
Hi groups,
How to match voice packet and data packet in CBWFQ?
class-map VOICE
match access-group 100
class-map DATA
match access-group 101
!
access-list 100 permit ip any any precedence critical
access-list 101 ???(I have no idea)?????
Can we use : access-list 101 deny ip any any precendence critical
access-list 101 permit ip any any ?
Thanks for your help,
Rivalino
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:47 GMT-3