From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Sun Jul 20 2003 - 00:20:20 GMT-3
Thanks, John. That's what I thought. So the second solution is the correct one.
Thanks,
Danny
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan V Hays [mailto:jhays@jtan.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Custom queuing question
Just like an access-list, the IOS reads the commands in order.
Please read this section of the 12.2 QoS configuration guide:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/
fqos_c/fqcprt2/qcfcq.htm#1000957
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:47 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Custom queuing question
Hello, Group. I have a pretty simple question on CQ. If I have the
following:
queue-list 1 protocol ip 1
queue-list 1 protocol ip 2 tcp telnet
queue-list 1 default 3
queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 4096
queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 1024
queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 5120
Wouldn't Telnet fall under queue 1? It is IP. I would think the router would see queue 1 and place this telnet traffic in queue 1. Or is the router smart enough to know there is another queue for telnet traffic? Here's another example:
access-list 108 deny tcp any any eq telnet
access-list 108 permit ip any any
access-list 109 permit tcp any any eq telnet
queue-list 1 protocol ip 2 list 109
queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 108
queue-list 1 default 3
queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 2000
queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 500
queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 2500
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
Wouldn't the above be more efficient? Telnet traffic is specifically being denied from queue 1 so all that is left is queue 2. What do you Fellas think?
Thanks,
Danny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:46 GMT-3