From: Timothy Snow (timsnow@cogeco.ca)
Date: Sat Jul 19 2003 - 13:32:31 GMT-3
That leads me to my next question.
Will "access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet" get telnet traffic both
ways or only one. Depending upon when I telnet from and the direction of
the flow, it should match my telnet class.
I've found that if one has overlying class-maps, to deny certain traffic in
one class that will be permitted in another. Not always. Just when overlaps
occur, such as in my previous question.
Thanks Roberto.
Tim
Roberto Adjakou wrote:
> 1. Check your classes.
> 2. Your policy is applied for outbound traffic. So how can you test
> telnet class? Try to telnet host connected via you serial interface.
>
> Cordialement/Best regards;
>
> -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
> Roberto Adjakou
> -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Timothy Snow [mailto:timsnow@cogeco.ca]
> Envoyi : samedi 19 juillet 2003 05:01
> @ : ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Objet : Class-map order in a service policy?
>
> I have a question regarding the order of class-maps? Does it make a
> difference in a service policy. My task was to give IP traffic a
> bandwith of 40% of the link while telnet gets 10%. I know that it won't
> really kick in until there is contention for the link but the "show
> policy-map int s 0" shows that traffic is hitting the IP class but not
> the telnet class even though I have telnet sessions active.
>
> Could anyone elaborate on if there is a structured order?
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 150.20.0.5 255.255.255.224
> encapsulation frame-relay
> service-policy output foo
> no arp frame-relay
> frame-relay map ip 150.20.0.2 504
> frame-relay map ip 150.20.0.4 504 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 150.20.0.6 504
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
>
> policy-map foo
> class ip
> bandwidth percent 40
> class telnet
> bandwidth percent 10
> class class-default
> fair-queue
>
> access-list 100 permit ip any any
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet log
>
> r5>sh policy-map int s 0
>
> Serial0
>
> Service-policy output: foo
>
> Class-map: ip (match-all)
> 504 packets, 210843 bytes
> 5 minute offered rate 16000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: access-group 100
> Weighted Fair Queueing
> Output Queue: Conversation 265
> Bandwidth 40 (%) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
> (pkts matched/bytes matched) 427/204125
> (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
> Class-map: telnet (match-all)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: access-group 101
> Weighted Fair Queueing
> Output Queue: Conversation 266
> Bandwidth 10 (%) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
> (pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
> (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
> 35 packets, 455 bytes
> 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: any
> Weighted Fair Queueing
> Flow Based Fair Queueing
> Maximum Number of Hashed Queues 256
> (total queued/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:46 GMT-3