RE: Reward Offered to first person with correct answer to ospF

From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Fri Jul 18 2003 - 14:31:51 GMT-3


Raj,

Since very few of us live in that area, I think a couple of thousand US
dollars via PayPal would be a more reasonable reward, don't you? <G>

If you have limited time and are spending it in serious preparation for
the CCIE R&S lab exam, I have to ask: why even bother with IGRP? The
IGRP protocol has not been on any CCIE Lab since October 31, 2002. Cisco
specifically says it won't be on the lab here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/le2/le23/le7/learning_certificat
ion_type_home.html

If you really want help with this scenario, please post complete,
unedited configurations of all three routers, along with "sh ip route".
Doing that is more likely to get people interested in your problem
because we won't be playing a back-and-forth guessing game about how you
have everything configured.

Post your configs.

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Group Study
Subject: Reward Offered to first person with correct answer to ospF
problem

Hi group,

This morning at 9:01, I posted an ospf problem regarding summarizing an
area 0
subnet so that it can be redistributed into igrp. This problem
continues to
baffle me, so I am offering a reward of free drinks to the first person
who
provides the correct solution and a clear explanation. The reward can
be
collected at your choice of any establishment in Manhattan or Queens
(other
NYC tri-state locations are also possible).

I've spent too many hours on this problem and I need to move on to other
labs,
but I'd like to understand what the #$%&*( is going on before
starting
on something else.

See my post (from ccie2be re: OSPF passive advertise) for a full
description
of the problem and feel free to request additional info if anything is
unclear. Raj



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:44 GMT-3