Re: static multicast RP's

From: Cristian Henry H (chenry@reuna.cl)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 10:23:58 GMT-3

• Next message: John Matijevic: "Re: dhcp exclude with both host pool and network pool"
• Previous message: Connie Nie: "dhcp exclude with both host pool and network pool"
• Maybe in reply to: Brown, Patrick (NSOC-OCF}: "static multicast RP's"
• Next in thread: Hung, Sing-Yu: "RE: static multicast RP's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

For me, the firts is the better one

"Brown, Patrick (NSOC-OCF}" ha escrito:
>
> Would the following config be enough to make sure r1 only registers with the
> RP 1.1.1.1 for multicast addresses 224.1.1.1 and 224.1.1.2?
>
> r1
> ip pim rp-address 1.1.1.1 5
>
> access-list 5 permit 224.1.1.1
> access-list 5 permit 224.1.1.2
> access-list 5 deny any
>
> or would I have to do
>
> r1
> ip pim rp-address 1.1.1.1
> ip pim accept-rp 1.1.1.1. 3 5
>
> access-list 3 permit 1.1.1.1
>
> access-list 5 permit 224.1.1.1
> access-list 5 permit 224.1.1.2
> access-list 5 deny any
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

-- 
Cristian E. Henry
REUNA
E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
Fono: 56-2-3370336

• Next message: John Matijevic: "Re: dhcp exclude with both host pool and network pool"
• Previous message: Connie Nie: "dhcp exclude with both host pool and network pool"
• Maybe in reply to: Brown, Patrick (NSOC-OCF}: "static multicast RP's"
• Next in thread: Hung, Sing-Yu: "RE: static multicast RP's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:43 GMT-3