From: Alexander Arsenyev (GU/ETL) (alexander.arsenyev@ericsson.com)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 08:06:22 GMT-3
Hello,
What about this:
1) define static route(s) on R4 covering part of "net Backbone" and pointing to respective R4 interface. It should be more specific than connected route, maybe even with /32 netmask, in order to be present in R4 route table.
2) "redistribute static subnets" on R4 into OSPF process
3) define "area 49 range <net Backbone range>" on R4
This way R4 will have area 49 LSAs defined in its OSPF database and "net Backbone" LSA type 5 will go into areas 0 and 49.
If there is no restrictions on how "net Backbone" should be represented nad/or "net Backbone" propagation into area 0 then I believe it answers Your question.
Cheers
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Volkov, Dmitry (IDS Canada) [mailto:dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com]
Sent: 13 July 2003 20:50
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: How to put interface in OSPF area without "network" statement
or "red connect"
One CCIE lab workbook has the following lab requirement:
Area0--(net A)---R4----(net Backbone)--
R4 backbone interface should be in OSPF area 49, but you cannot use the
network
command to intclude this interface. You are also prohibited from
redistributing connected networks.
?????
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:39 GMT-3