BGP Timers (Which one is which? )

From: Jeongwoo Park (jpark@wams.com)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 09:43:50 GMT-3

Next message: kagbomson@comcast.net: "ISDN SIMULATOR"
Previous message: polarccie@yahoo.co.uk: "traffic-shared balanced - subject corrected"
Next in thread: John Matijevic: "Re: BGP Timers (Which one is which? )"
Maybe reply: John Matijevic: "Re: BGP Timers (Which one is which? )"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

r4(config-router)#nei 120.20.124.2 timers ?
  <0-4294967295> Keepalive interval

r4(config-router)#nei 120.20.124.2 timers 40 ?
  <0-4294967295> Holdtime

r4(config-router)#nei 120.20.124.2 timers 40 20 ?
  <cr>

r4(config-router)#nei 120.20.124.2 timers 40 20
% Keepalive time should be greater than the hold time
r4(config-router)#nei 120.20.124.2 timers 20 40
r4(config-router)#

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com <http://mail.giantcompany.com>

Next message: kagbomson@comcast.net: "ISDN SIMULATOR"
Previous message: polarccie@yahoo.co.uk: "traffic-shared balanced - subject corrected"
Next in thread: John Matijevic: "Re: BGP Timers (Which one is which? )"
Maybe reply: John Matijevic: "Re: BGP Timers (Which one is which? )"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:34 GMT-3