From: Adam Asay (aasay@cwfservice.net)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 16:27:40 GMT-3
Add network 170.100.23.0 0.0.0.255 area X to the OSPF process on router
2. Without this command on the network to reach the RIP router is
unavailable.
Thanks
Adam
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 13:07, Jeongwoo Park wrote:
> As you recommend, I added the route-map.
> R1 is still not seeing the rip network.
>
>
> router ospf 1
> router-id 2.2.2.2
> log-adjacency-changes
> summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
> redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
> redistribute rip subnets route-map r2o
> network 170.100.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> !
> router rip
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 3
> passive-interface default
> no passive-interface Serial0/0.23
> network 170.100.0.0
> !
> ip classless
> ip http server
> !
> access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
> access-list 2 permit 170.100.23.0 0.0.0.255
> access-list 2 permit 170.100.51.0 0.0.0.255
> dialer watch-list 1 ip 170.100.30.1 255.255.255.255
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
> route-map r2o permit 10
> match ip address 2
> !
> route-map c2o permit 10
> match ip address 1
>
>
> R1's routing table
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mo
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA exter
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, i
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0
>
> 170.200.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O E2 170.200.212.0 [110/20] via 170.100.15.5, 04:25:37,
> 170.100.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 3 ma
> O 170.100.124.2/32 [110/64] via 170.100.124.2, 04:25:
> C 170.100.124.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> O 170.100.124.4/32 [110/128] via 170.100.124.2, 04:25
> C 170.100.15.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
> O 170.100.12.0/28 [110/1626] via 170.100.124.2, 04:25
> C 170.100.30.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1
> O E2 170.100.20.0/24 [110/20] via 170.100.124.2, 00:47:4
> O E2 170.100.40.0/24 [110/20] via 170.100.30.4, 04:25:38
> O IA 170.100.55.0/24 [110/11] via 170.100.15.5, 04:25:48
> O E2 170.100.51.0/24 [110/20] via 170.100.124.2, 04:05:4
> S* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
> Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
> http://mail.giantcompany.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Matijevic [mailto:matijevi@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:56 AM
> To: Jeongwoo Park; Brian Dennis; 'Badger'
> Cc: 'Ram Shummoogum'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
>
> Hello Jeongwoo,
> I am working on a similar type of scenerio.
> I am going to recommend that you make the following change:
> > redistribute rip subnets route-map r2o
> scroll down to config to view my recommended change on R2,
> Please test and let us know results.
> Sincerely,
> Matijevic
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeongwoo Park" <jpark@wams.com>
> To: "'John Matijevic'" <matijevi@bellsouth.net>; "Brian Dennis"
> <brian@labforge.com>; "'Badger'" <badger@pongo.org>
> Cc: "'Ram Shummoogum'" <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:12 PM
> Subject: RE: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
>
>
> > Here you go;
> >
> > R1;
> > hostname r1
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > no ip domain-lookup
> > !
> > isdn switch-type basic-ni
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > ip address 170.100.15.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > backup interface BRI0/0
> > ip address 170.100.124.1 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > frame-relay map ip 170.100.124.2 102 broadcast
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > !
> > interface BRI0/0
> > ip address 170.100.12.1 255.255.255.240
> > encapsulation ppp
> > dialer map ip 170.100.12.2 broadcast 8358661
> > dialer-group 1
> > isdn switch-type basic-ni
> > isdn spid1 0835866201 08358662
> > isdn spid2 0835866401 08358664
> > no peer neighbor-route
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/1
> > ip address 170.100.30.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > router ospf 1
> > router-id 1.1.1.1
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > area 2 virtual-link 5.5.5.5
> > network 170.100.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > network 170.100.15.0 0.0.0.255 area 2
> > network 170.100.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 3
> > network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > !
> >
> > r2;
> > hostname R2
> > !
> > !
> > username all
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > no ip domain-lookup
> > !
> > isdn switch-type basic-ni
> > !
> > !
> > voice-port 1/0/0
> > !
> > voice-port 1/0/1
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > ip address 170.100.20.2 255.255.255.248
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no fair-queue
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0.23 point-to-point
> > ip address 170.100.23.2 255.255.255.0
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 203
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0.124 multipoint
> > ip address 170.100.124.2 255.255.255.0
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 201
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 204
> > !
> > interface BRI0/0
> > ip address 170.100.12.2 255.255.255.240
> > encapsulation ppp
> > dialer map ip 170.100.12.1 broadcast 8358662
> > dialer map ip 170.100.30.1 broadcast 8358662
> > dialer watch-group 1
> > dialer-group 1
> > isdn switch-type basic-ni
> > isdn spid1 0835866101 8358661
> > isdn spid2 0835866301 8358663
> > no peer neighbor-route
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/1
> > no ip address
> > shutdown
> > !
> > router ospf 1
> > router-id 2.2.2.2
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
> > redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
> > redistribute rip subnets
> **Add here route-map r2o
> > network 170.100.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > !
> > router rip
> > redistribute ospf 1 metric 3
> > passive-interface default
> > no passive-interface Serial0/0.23
> > network 170.100.0.0
> > !
> > ip classless
> > ip http server
> > !
> > access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
> > access-list 2 permit 170.100.23.0 0.0.0.255
> > access-list 2 permit 170.100.51.0 0.0.0.255
> > dialer watch-list 1 ip 170.100.30.1 255.255.255.255
> > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
> > route-map r2o permit 10
> > match ip address 2
> > !
> > route-map c2o permit 10
> > match ip address 1
> > !
> >
> > r3;
> > hostname r3
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > no ip domain-lookup
> > ip host r7 2007 10.0.136.1
> > ip host pix3 2008 10.0.136.1
> > ip host r5 2005 10.0.136.1
> > ip host r4 2004 10.0.136.1
> > ip host r3 2003 10.0.136.1
> > ip host r6 2006 10.0.136.1
> > ip host r2 2002 10.0.136.1
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 170.100.51.3 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 10.0.136.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0.12
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 170.100.23.3 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no fair-queue
> > frame-relay map ip 170.100.23.2 302 broadcast
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > !
> > interface Serial1
> > no ip address
> > shutdown
> > !
> > router rip
> > passive-interface default
> > no passive-interface Serial0
> > network 170.100.0.0
> > !
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
> > Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
> > http://mail.giantcompany.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Matijevic [mailto:matijevi@bellsouth.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:26 AM
> > To: Brian Dennis; 'Badger'
> > Cc: 'Ram Shummoogum'; park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> >
> > Jeongwoo,
> > I am a little confused about which interfaces and ips are in what protocol
> > processes. I believe this may have been mentioned earlier, but could you
> > please post full configs so we can have a better idea of whats going on.
> > Sincerley,
> > Matijevic
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brian Dennis" <brian@labforge.com>
> > To: "'Badger'" <badger@pongo.org>
> > Cc: "'Ram Shummoogum'" <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>; <park@wams.com>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> >
> >
> > > How could adding the RIP interfaces to the route-map that is used for
> > > redistribute connected affect the requirements?
> > >
> > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Badger
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:55 AM
> > > To: Brian Dennis
> > > Cc: 'Ram Shummoogum'; park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> > >
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > I tried that too, but it seems that in a lab environtment that that
> > > solution
> > > would violate the rule of only placing an interface under the routing
> > > process
> > > that is specified in the requirements...I grabbing straws here, because
> > > I'm
> > > afraid of losing points on the exam for doig this.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting Brian Dennis <brian@labforge.com>:
> > >
> > > > It still happens in 12.3. The solution is of course to add the
> > > > interfaces that are running RIP to the route-map that is used for the
> > > > redistribution of the connected routes.
> > > >
> > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > Badger
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:14 AM
> > > > To: Ram Shummoogum
> > > > Cc: park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: Re: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> > > >
> > > > I posted a similar problem "Subject OSPF <-> EIGRP redistribution."
> > > > I'm
> > > > experiencing this not only with rip/ospf, but also ospf/eigrp. I have
> > > > found a
> > > > cause/reason/solution yet. I use 12.1.5(14)T and plan to just flash
> > > > 12.2x to
> > > > see if it fixes the rpoblem.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Ram Shummoogum <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > I don't think you are tripping. I have been observing this too in
> > > few
> > > > > ipexpert labs and I always keep any eye on this.
> > > > >
> > > > > RAM
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>@groupstudy.com on 07/09/2003 11:28:26
> > > > AM
> > > > >
> > > > > Please respond to Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To: lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > cc:
> > > > > Subject: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, all
> > > > > Here is the layout where the "redistribute connected" got me.
> > > > >
> > > > > R1-----ospf------R2-lo 0
> > > > > |
> > > > > rip
> > > > > |
> > > > > R3
> > > > >
> > > > > What I did was that I redistributed the connected network (loopback
> > > > > network)
> > > > > into ospf with route-map only for the loopback network like this.
> > > > > router ospf 1
> > > > > router-id 2.2.2.2
> > > > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > > > summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
> > > > > redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
> > > > > redistribute rip subnets
> > > > > network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > > > > !
> > > > > route-map c2o permit 10
> > > > > match ip address 1
> > > > > !
> > > > > access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, I redistribute rip into ospf on R2.
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem is that R1 can't see the rip network.
> > > > >
> > > > > What I think is the gotcha is that when R2 redistribute "Connected"
> > > > with
> > > > > route-map, it filtered the rip network, because the rip network is
> > > the
> > > > > connected network as well from the R2's stand point.
> > > > >
> > > > > Am I saying right or I am tripping?
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know what I am doing wrong here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > JP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > > > >
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > > > >
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----------------
> > > > G'day
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > > >
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------
> > > G'day
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:31 GMT-3