From: Jeongwoo Park (jpark@wams.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 15:12:49 GMT-3
Here you go;
R1;
hostname r1
!
!
!
!
!
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
!
isdn switch-type basic-ni
!
!
!
!
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 170.100.15.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0/0
backup interface BRI0/0
ip address 170.100.124.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
frame-relay map ip 170.100.124.2 102 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
interface BRI0/0
ip address 170.100.12.1 255.255.255.240
encapsulation ppp
dialer map ip 170.100.12.2 broadcast 8358661
dialer-group 1
isdn switch-type basic-ni
isdn spid1 0835866201 08358662
isdn spid2 0835866401 08358664
no peer neighbor-route
!
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 170.100.30.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
router-id 1.1.1.1
log-adjacency-changes
area 2 virtual-link 5.5.5.5
network 170.100.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 170.100.15.0 0.0.0.255 area 2
network 170.100.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 3
network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
!
r2;
hostname R2
!
!
username all
!
!
!
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
!
isdn switch-type basic-ni
!
!
voice-port 1/0/0
!
voice-port 1/0/1
!
!
!
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 170.100.20.2 255.255.255.248
!
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
no fair-queue
!
interface Serial0/0.23 point-to-point
ip address 170.100.23.2 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 203
!
interface Serial0/0.124 multipoint
ip address 170.100.124.2 255.255.255.0
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
frame-relay interface-dlci 201
frame-relay interface-dlci 204
!
interface BRI0/0
ip address 170.100.12.2 255.255.255.240
encapsulation ppp
dialer map ip 170.100.12.1 broadcast 8358662
dialer map ip 170.100.30.1 broadcast 8358662
dialer watch-group 1
dialer-group 1
isdn switch-type basic-ni
isdn spid1 0835866101 8358661
isdn spid2 0835866301 8358663
no peer neighbor-route
!
interface Ethernet0/1
no ip address
shutdown
!
router ospf 1
router-id 2.2.2.2
log-adjacency-changes
summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
redistribute rip subnets
network 170.100.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
!
router rip
redistribute ospf 1 metric 3
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Serial0/0.23
network 170.100.0.0
!
ip classless
ip http server
!
access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
access-list 2 permit 170.100.23.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 permit 170.100.51.0 0.0.0.255
dialer watch-list 1 ip 170.100.30.1 255.255.255.255
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
route-map r2o permit 10
match ip address 2
!
route-map c2o permit 10
match ip address 1
!
r3;
hostname r3
!
!
!
!
!
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
ip host r7 2007 10.0.136.1
ip host pix3 2008 10.0.136.1
ip host r5 2005 10.0.136.1
ip host r4 2004 10.0.136.1
ip host r3 2003 10.0.136.1
ip host r6 2006 10.0.136.1
ip host r2 2002 10.0.136.1
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 170.100.51.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0
ip address 10.0.136.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0.12
!
interface Serial0
ip address 170.100.23.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no fair-queue
frame-relay map ip 170.100.23.2 302 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
interface Serial1
no ip address
shutdown
!
router rip
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Serial0
network 170.100.0.0
!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com
-----Original Message-----
From: John Matijevic [mailto:matijevi@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Brian Dennis; 'Badger'
Cc: 'Ram Shummoogum'; park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
Jeongwoo,
I am a little confused about which interfaces and ips are in what protocol
processes. I believe this may have been mentioned earlier, but could you
please post full configs so we can have a better idea of whats going on.
Sincerley,
Matijevic
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Dennis" <brian@labforge.com>
To: "'Badger'" <badger@pongo.org>
Cc: "'Ram Shummoogum'" <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>; <park@wams.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> How could adding the RIP interfaces to the route-map that is used for
> redistribute connected affect the requirements?
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Badger
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:55 AM
> To: Brian Dennis
> Cc: 'Ram Shummoogum'; park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> I tried that too, but it seems that in a lab environtment that that
> solution
> would violate the rule of only placing an interface under the routing
> process
> that is specified in the requirements...I grabbing straws here, because
> I'm
> afraid of losing points on the exam for doig this.
>
>
>
> Quoting Brian Dennis <brian@labforge.com>:
>
> > It still happens in 12.3. The solution is of course to add the
> > interfaces that are running RIP to the route-map that is used for the
> > redistribution of the connected routes.
> >
> > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Badger
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:14 AM
> > To: Ram Shummoogum
> > Cc: park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> >
> > I posted a similar problem "Subject OSPF <-> EIGRP redistribution."
> > I'm
> > experiencing this not only with rip/ospf, but also ospf/eigrp. I have
> > found a
> > cause/reason/solution yet. I use 12.1.5(14)T and plan to just flash
> > 12.2x to
> > see if it fixes the rpoblem.
> >
> >
> > Quoting Ram Shummoogum <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>:
> >
> > > I don't think you are tripping. I have been observing this too in
> few
> > > ipexpert labs and I always keep any eye on this.
> > >
> > > RAM
> > >
> > >
> > > Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>@groupstudy.com on 07/09/2003 11:28:26
> > AM
> > >
> > > Please respond to Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>
> > >
> > > Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > >
> > >
> > > To: lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > cc:
> > > Subject: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi, all
> > > Here is the layout where the "redistribute connected" got me.
> > >
> > > R1-----ospf------R2-lo 0
> > > |
> > > rip
> > > |
> > > R3
> > >
> > > What I did was that I redistributed the connected network (loopback
> > > network)
> > > into ospf with route-map only for the loopback network like this.
> > > router ospf 1
> > > router-id 2.2.2.2
> > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
> > > redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
> > > redistribute rip subnets
> > > network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > > !
> > > route-map c2o permit 10
> > > match ip address 1
> > > !
> > > access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
> > >
> > > Now, I redistribute rip into ospf on R2.
> > >
> > > The problem is that R1 can't see the rip network.
> > >
> > > What I think is the gotcha is that when R2 redistribute "Connected"
> > with
> > > route-map, it filtered the rip network, because the rip network is
> the
> > > connected network as well from the R2's stand point.
> > >
> > > Am I saying right or I am tripping?
> > >
> > > Please let me know what I am doing wrong here.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > JP
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------
> > G'day
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -----------------
> G'day
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:31 GMT-3