From: Badger (badger@pongo.org)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 13:55:29 GMT-3
Hi Brian,
I tried that too, but it seems that in a lab environtment that that solution
would violate the rule of only placing an interface under the routing process
that is specified in the requirements...I grabbing straws here, because I'm
afraid of losing points on the exam for doig this.
Quoting Brian Dennis <brian@labforge.com>:
> It still happens in 12.3. The solution is of course to add the
> interfaces that are running RIP to the route-map that is used for the
> redistribution of the connected routes.
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Badger
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:14 AM
> To: Ram Shummoogum
> Cc: park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
>
> I posted a similar problem "Subject OSPF <-> EIGRP redistribution."
> I'm
> experiencing this not only with rip/ospf, but also ospf/eigrp. I have
> found a
> cause/reason/solution yet. I use 12.1.5(14)T and plan to just flash
> 12.2x to
> see if it fixes the rpoblem.
>
>
> Quoting Ram Shummoogum <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>:
>
> > I don't think you are tripping. I have been observing this too in few
> > ipexpert labs and I always keep any eye on this.
> >
> > RAM
> >
> >
> > Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>@groupstudy.com on 07/09/2003 11:28:26
> AM
> >
> > Please respond to Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>
> >
> > Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >
> >
> > To: lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
> >
> >
> > Hi, all
> > Here is the layout where the "redistribute connected" got me.
> >
> > R1-----ospf------R2-lo 0
> > |
> > rip
> > |
> > R3
> >
> > What I did was that I redistributed the connected network (loopback
> > network)
> > into ospf with route-map only for the loopback network like this.
> > router ospf 1
> > router-id 2.2.2.2
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
> > redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
> > redistribute rip subnets
> > network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > !
> > route-map c2o permit 10
> > match ip address 1
> > !
> > access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
> >
> > Now, I redistribute rip into ospf on R2.
> >
> > The problem is that R1 can't see the rip network.
> >
> > What I think is the gotcha is that when R2 redistribute "Connected"
> with
> > route-map, it filtered the rip network, because the rip network is the
> > connected network as well from the R2's stand point.
> >
> > Am I saying right or I am tripping?
> >
> > Please let me know what I am doing wrong here.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > JP
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> -----------------
> G'day
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
-----------------
G'day
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:30 GMT-3