From: Ram Shummoogum (rshummoo@ca.ibm.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 12:49:30 GMT-3
I don't think you are tripping. I have been observing this too in few
ipexpert labs and I always keep any eye on this.
RAM
Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>@groupstudy.com on 07/09/2003 11:28:26 AM
Please respond to Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc:
Subject: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
Hi, all
Here is the layout where the "redistribute connected" got me.
R1-----ospf------R2-lo 0
|
rip
|
R3
What I did was that I redistributed the connected network (loopback
network)
into ospf with route-map only for the loopback network like this.
router ospf 1
router-id 2.2.2.2
log-adjacency-changes
summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
redistribute rip subnets
network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
!
route-map c2o permit 10
match ip address 1
!
access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
Now, I redistribute rip into ospf on R2.
The problem is that R1 can't see the rip network.
What I think is the gotcha is that when R2 redistribute "Connected" with
route-map, it filtered the rip network, because the rip network is the
connected network as well from the R2's stand point.
Am I saying right or I am tripping?
Please let me know what I am doing wrong here.
Thanks,
JP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:30 GMT-3