From: Craig Muirhead (craigmuirhead@ntlworld.com)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 07:27:55 GMT-3
ROUTER1 ----------- ROUTER2---------------ROUTER3
<ISIS> <OSPF>
Has anyone encountered the above scenario when redistributing between ISIS and
OSPF where connected routes are not advertised.
Suppose that the routing protocols in use were limited to one routing protocol
per interface. In which case "ROUTER2" would perform mutual redistribution.
The problem is that the subnet defined on the interconnecting link between
"ROUTER1" and "ROUTER2" does not appear on ROUTER3. I have tried numerous
methods to instate this route, however, ROUTER2 learns it as connected and so
does not regard it as part of the ISIS process which is being redistributed
into OSPF. Therefore, ROUTER3 never learns of this network.
I have been referring to numerous articles on CONNECTED ROUTES and haven't
found the answer yet. The following link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide
09186a00800ad395.html#91039 offered some hope, however, it is not accepted in
the IOS in use on my lab.
Any ideas would be most welcome.
Thanks,
Craig.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:26 GMT-3